My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/2001 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2001
>
07/09/2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 3:30:09 PM
Creation date
2/21/2014 2:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/09/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Saddle Club <br />July 9, 2001 <br />page 4 <br />7. Reasons for the recommendation to deny the project from the Planning & Zoning <br />Board. <br />The Planning & Zoning Board did not state reasons for the recommendation to deny. <br />The attached minutes accurately reflect the discussion. Boardmember Lyden asked <br />about costs of utilities, opposed requesting additional MUSA, and said that houses <br />these days are getting too big for the lots, so he would prefer R -1X zoning. <br />Staff notes that utility costs are addressed in the feasibility study prepared by the City <br />Engineer and summarized below. <br />The application is a request for allocation of some of our MUSA reserve. This <br />project is in the location designated for use of MUSA reserve and meets the <br />requirements of the City's infill and MUSA reserve policies. The property is one <br />parcel that is cut in half with the current zoning and MUSA line. The MUSA and <br />rezoning requests include only the southern half of the property. <br />8. Cost breakdown of road and utilities to serve the project and who will bear the costs. <br />The cost break down to serve the Saddle Club with utilities from the west or from the <br />north is shown below: <br />The prices shown include a 10% contingency and 20% for engineering, legal, and <br />administrative costs. These costs assume that the City would pay for the extension of <br />the trunk watermain. <br />The estimated Trunk Assessments for the Saddle Club are $180,157. Using the total <br />costs from the table above, the net impact on the City trunk funds is as follows: <br />Service from the West <br />Service from the North <br />- $98,389 <br />- $309,859 <br />Extending the utilities from the north will cost the City an additional $211,470 <br />Environmental Board Recommendation <br />There was some discussion about the Environmental Board review of the project. As <br />noted in the April 28 memo attached to the staff report, the Environmental Board <br />recommended approval of the project, with some additional comment. A July 2, 2001 <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />Watermain <br />Streets <br />Total <br />Service from West <br />$77,662 <br />$48,919 <br />$151,965 <br />$278,546 <br />Service from North <br />$113,385 <br />$71,982 <br />$304,649 <br />$490,016 <br />The prices shown include a 10% contingency and 20% for engineering, legal, and <br />administrative costs. These costs assume that the City would pay for the extension of <br />the trunk watermain. <br />The estimated Trunk Assessments for the Saddle Club are $180,157. Using the total <br />costs from the table above, the net impact on the City trunk funds is as follows: <br />Service from the West <br />Service from the North <br />- $98,389 <br />- $309,859 <br />Extending the utilities from the north will cost the City an additional $211,470 <br />Environmental Board Recommendation <br />There was some discussion about the Environmental Board review of the project. As <br />noted in the April 28 memo attached to the staff report, the Environmental Board <br />recommended approval of the project, with some additional comment. A July 2, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.