Laserfiche WebLink
Rezoning, Lake Drive /Aqua Lane <br />page 3 <br />473.865 Adoption; conflicts, amendment of controls, devices. <br />Subdivision 1. Control copies to council. Each local governmental unit shall adopt <br />official controls as described in its adopted comprehensive plan and shall submit copies <br />of the official controls to the council within 30 days following adoption thereof, for <br />information purposes only. <br />Subd. 2. No conflict with plans. A local governmental unit shall not adopt any official <br />control or fiscal device which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan or which permits <br />activity in conflict with metropolitan system plans. <br />Subd. 3. Amendments. If an official control conflicts with a comprehensive plan as the <br />result of an amendment to the plan, the official control shall be amended by the unit <br />within nine months following the amendment to the plan so as to not conflict with the <br />amended comprehensive plan. <br />The comprehensive plan was amended in 2002. The zoning ordinance is an official control. The <br />zoning map is part of the zoning ordinance. The R -4 High Density zoning of the site conflicts <br />with the Medium Density land use category in the comprehensive plan. Though this conflict was <br />not corrected within nine months of the plan amendment, it does not remove the city's obligation <br />to correct the conflict. <br />The zoning ordinance lays out the process and criteria for a rezoning. <br />SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION <br />Subd. 1. Administration: Amendments and Rezonings. In accordance with the <br />provisions of Minnesota Statutes, the City Council may from time to time amend the <br />Zoning Ordinance text or map (rezoning). Amendments may be initiated by City <br />Council, Planning and Zoning Board, or property owner. The procedure for an <br />amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning District Map (rezone) shall be as follows: <br />E. The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the <br />proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the <br />following factors: <br />1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and <br />provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />As explained above, the current R -4 High Density Zoning conflicts with the Medium Density <br />land use category of the comprehensive plan. The purpose of the rezoning is to correct this <br />inconsistency between the comprehensive plan and the zoning. State statute requires that <br />official controls found to be in conflict with the comprehensive plan must be amended so as <br />not to conflict. <br />