01/26/2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

3. The existing high density zoning classification is logical and harmonious with the land use pattern for the greater area. 4. The existing high density zoning classification helps the City achieve the adopted goals and density requirements of the adopted Livable Community Goals of Resolution No. 98 -175, through private development. High density will continue to improve on the variety of housing choices. 5. The sites infrastructure, including storm water ponds, is built and constructed to accommodate high density. 6. The existing Marshan Lake Condominiums development and subject 4 acre property are both guided for medium density in the comprehensive plan. By rezoning the subject four acre property to medium density and leaving the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums as high density, an inconsistency is created. It is encouraged that the City fully reviews the complexity of the rezone and the errors contained within the comprehensive plan. A visit to the area would clearly demonstrate the sites best and most compatible use is a high density development similar scope and scale to those already built along Lake Drive, i.e. the 36 units existing adjacent to Lake Drive are built on approximately 2.5 acres with a density exceeding 14 dwelling units per acre. These 36 existing units consist of 3 twelve plexes. High- density development on the subject four acre parcel could be accomplished with buildings of fewer units and a density less than the adjacent density. Considering the past and future development in the surrounding area and the regulations imposed by the city of Lino Lakes to encourage smart growth, this site would best be served with a high density zoning classification. The rezone application in itself is in error in that it does not address nor rezones that portion of Marshan Lake Condominiums that is designated as medium density (i.e. existing Marshan). In summation, there exists no inconsistency with the past or current zoning classification of this property. It is requested that the application for rezone be denied. Sincerely, Ronald G. Fuchs Hokanson Development