Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />December 17', 200'3 <br />Mr. Michael Grochala: <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />RE The Legacy at WoodsEdge Development <br />Dear Mr. Grocbala: <br />The draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development has <br />been reviewed by Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff. This comment letter addresses <br />matters of concern to MPCA staff reviewing the EAW and is submitted for consideration by the City of <br />Lino Lakes, the responsible governmental unit, in deciding whether an Environmental Impact Statement <br />should be prepared on the project., It does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of <br />the project for the purpose of pending or future permit action(s) by the MPCA. We have attempted to <br />identify and consult with interested program staff to identify the MPCA permits that may be required. <br />Additional comments or requests for information maybe submitted in the future to address specific issues <br />related to the development of such permit(s). Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the project proposer to <br />secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. <br />The following comments are made for your use in revising the draft EAW. <br />Item 17:b. <br />This section should include the need to comply with the MPCA Phase II Stormwater Permit. The EAW <br />states "Following development of the proposed site, storm water will be treated through infiltration in <br />open spaces or subsurface chamber technology and through retention ponds that will meet National <br />Urban Runoff Program (NURP) guidelines ..... ' The Phase II NPDES permit contains requirements for <br />sizing and settling velocities that the pond must achieve in order to be in compliance with the permit. <br />These requirements are not the same asNURP requirements and need to be incorporated in to the pond <br />design." <br />Thank you for the opportunity to review the EAW. Should you have any questions about this letter, <br />please contact meat (651) 296-7796. <br />Sincerely, <br />Vn <br />Kelly Garvey <br />Project Manager <br />Operations and Environmental Review Section <br />Regional Environmental Management Division <br />KG.min <br />529 Lafayette Rd. N.; Saint Paul, MN 551554194; (612).296.6300 (Voice); (612) 282 -5332 (TTY); www.pca.atate.mn.us <br />St. Paul • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Duluth • Mankato • Marshal Rochester. Willmar <br />Egeni oppott nityEmployer • Printed on recycled paper containing at Waal 20 percent fibers horn paper recycled by consumers. <br />1 <br />RESPONSE <br />The permanent storm water management system will consist of a combination of wet sediment basins and <br />infiltration systems (underground chambers and ponds) to meet the requirements of the NPDES Permit No. <br />MN R100001. Furthermore, the project has been designed to meet the Rice Creek Watershed District <br />infiltration requirements of 0.34 inches of runoff and dead storage requirements of 2.5 inches of runoff. A <br />large portion of the runoff from the site is directed to a series of infiltration basins /ponds located along the <br />southerly and easterly boundaries of the site or through underground infiltration chambers. Runoff from <br />these systems eventually outlet to a wetland (Wetland 2 on Figure 7 of the EAW) that is connected to <br />another extensive wetland complex (Wetland 1) that is located in the George Watch Lake watershed. <br />