Laserfiche WebLink
Eagle Brook Church <br />page 7 <br />Residents have questioned the water use /wastewater generation assumptions used as the <br />basis for the design of the church's wastewater system. For comparison purposes, the <br />Metropolitan Council uses a sewer availability charge (SAC unit) as a basis for billing for <br />sanitary sewer service. One SAC unit is based on 274 gallons per day. Churches are <br />charged one SAC for each 275 seats. For a 2100 seat church, this would be 7.64 SAC <br />units, which calculates out to an estimated 2093 gallons per day. If the church expands to <br />2800 seats, this calculates out to 10.2 SAC units, or 2795 gpd. Weekly worship schools <br />are charged one SAC (274 gpd) per 55 students. The Eagle Brook System is based on a <br />treatment capacity of 2800 gallons per day. <br />Water Well: The existing well on Lot 2 is indicated on the plat. It is within the <br />property lines and properly separated from the secondary drainfield location. <br />A new well will be created for the church. If municipal water service becomes available, <br />the church should be required to connect. This is included in the conditions of approval. <br />As a condition of plan approval, utility related modifications and comments as set forth in <br />the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the final plans. <br />Wetlands, Grading, and Stormwater Management: Four wetlands are <br />located on or partially on the project site. One is part of the shoreline of the lake in the <br />southwest part of the site. Another is near a depression surrounded by wooded upland. <br />These two will not be disturbed by the proposed church project. <br />A third wetland is a swale in the northwest area of the site which is surrounded with tilled <br />farmland. The fourth is on the northeast corner of the site is part of a larger wetland <br />located mostly north of the site. These two wetlands are drainageways and have been <br />degraded by agricultural runoff and are vegetated primarily with reed canary grass. <br />The plans show a 25' setback from the wetlands. No building or pavement would be <br />placed in these areas. Under City requirements, all wetlands must be protected with a <br />drainage and utility easement. This will be enlarged to include the 25' setback. <br />County Ditch 72 is an underground drain tile, including the stretch crossing the property. <br />The main branch of County Ditch 72 begins about 4300 feet southeast of the site. <br />Branch 1 of the ditch begins about 2500 feet south of the site. These merge on the site, <br />then drain into the swale wetland, which then runs into the lake. Currently, there is no <br />pretreatment of runoff in the tile ditch system or runoff from the agricultural land before <br />it flows into the wetlands and lake. <br />The proposed stormwater design shows that runoff will be collected by a series of swales, <br />infiltration areas /rain gardens, and stormwater ponds, providing pretreatment of all runoff <br />from the development. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District has review authority over the stormwater design and <br />issued a conditional approval in October 2003. The county ditch will be rerouted, in a <br />new underground drain tile, around the development area. This was required by the <br />Resolution 04 -17, page 7 <br />