My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/26/2004 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2004
>
04/26/2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2014 10:07:42 AM
Creation date
2/28/2014 11:30:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/26/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 04-50 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT <br />AREA, LOT WIDTH, AND ROAD FRONTAGE FOR THE ST. PAUL REGIONAL <br />WATER SERVICES <br />WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a minor subdivision <br />which requires variances for lot area, lot width, and road frontage, and <br />WHEREAS, review and approvals of variances are governed by state statutes and City <br />ordinances, and <br />WHEREAS, the site is that described in the legal description in Attachment A, and <br />WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings: <br />a. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />• by the official controls. The site is completely surrounded by the lake and the regional park <br />reserve. It cannot be developed as a usable parcel. The dam on the site regulates the water <br />level of Peltier Lake. The site cannot be used for anything else. It has no road frontage now. <br />Of the two lots being created, one will include the dam. The second will be attached to an <br />adjacent parcel owned by Anoka County as part of the park reserve. <br />b. The plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the land owner. The physical shape, location, and isolated nature of the parcel <br />prevent use for anything other than the dam and the park reserve. <br />c. The hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property <br />exists under the terms of the ordinance. Economic considerations are not the only part of the <br />situation. The intent is to convey the broken off land to Anoka County for park use. <br />d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that <br />would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land locked parcels <br />owned and operated exclusively for public purposes would receive the same consideration. <br />e. The proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. As stated <br />in the zoning ordinance, the PSP zoning district is designed and intended to aid in guiding <br />development towards fulfillment of the Comprehensive Plan and to serve a number of <br />functions, including to provide the community with properly located public services and <br />public utilities, provide the community with properly located open green space, parks, <br />playgrounds and recreational facilities. This proposed variances will allow a minor <br />subdivision that provides for public services and utilities by serving the regulation of the lake <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.