Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Amending Growth Management Policy <br />page 2 <br />collaborative process in which certain stipulated public values are sought in exchange for greater <br />flexibility on general development requirements and the growth limits defined under the policy. <br />The Fox Den Acres project offers a good opportunity to implement the new parks and open <br />space plan through the use of a conservation development. The project is going through a very <br />collaborative process that includes city staff, the Rice Creek Watershed District, and the <br />developer. Instead of asking "does the project meet the requirements ?" we have been asking <br />"what is the best design ?" The design includes such things as filling and moving lower quality <br />wetlands in order to preserve and increase higher quality wetlands and upland areas. The overall <br />gain in public value will be positive. <br />Options for Amending the Policy <br />The adopted ordinance is attached, with amendment options added. Added language is shown in <br />underlined text. Deleted language is shown in strikeout text. <br />We have presented two options. Both would add a new Section 3 of the ordinance. <br />• Option 1 would exempt conservation development from the growth restrictions. That is, a <br />conservation development would be subject to neither the annual MUSA allocation limit (36 <br />acres per year) nor the units restriction (147 per year or 1029 total for Stage 1). <br />• Option 2 allows a conservation development to final plat lots /units two years in advance of <br />its approved phasing plan. That is, it would still have a phasing plan but the number of <br />lots /units in the phasing plans could be moved ahead by two years. In effect, the first three <br />years of units could be final platted in year one. <br />With either option: <br />The Stage 1 and Stage 2 growth boundaries still apply. These are the areas within which <br />growth is to occur. <br />The total MUSA reserve for stage 1 would still apply: 300.7 residential acres for stage 1. <br />We currently have 130 acres remaining. We could not exceed this because this is what <br />we received from the Metropolitan Council, based on the amount listed in the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />The prohibition on premature development would still apply. The subdivision ordinance <br />prohibits premature development to ensure adequate infrastructure exists to support new <br />residential development. <br />All growth restrictions would still apply for conventional development. In fact, the <br />proposed amendments include eliminating the discretionary 20% additional annual <br />growth for conventional development. <br />