My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/08/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
01/08/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2014 10:25:23 AM
Creation date
3/6/2014 11:21:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Anoka County Multi - Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />• 3 — Action requires limited or no ongoing maintenance. Jurisdiction <br />has demonstrated ability to perform this action. <br />• 2 — Unknown or action has the potential for moderate ongoing <br />maintenance. <br />• 1 — The action is likely to require high level of ongoing maintenance. <br />• POLITICAL <br />• Political Support — L =1 <br />• 1 — Local Elected Official likely to be contentious <br />• 2 — Local Elected Official may be controversial <br />• 3 — Local Elected Official likely to be supportive <br />• Local Champion — L =1 <br />• 1 — Unlikely there is a Local Elected Official to support <br />• 2 — Uncertain if there is a Local Elected Official to champion <br />• 3 — A Local Elected Official is likely to support and champion <br />• Public Support — L =1 <br />• 1 — Public Political support is unlikely <br />• 2 — Public Political support is uncertain <br />• 3 — Public Political support is likely <br />• LEGAL <br />• State Authority Exists — L =1 <br />• 1 — No legal state authority exists <br />• 2 — Legal state authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in <br />progress <br />• 3 — Legal state authority exists <br />• Local Authority Exists — L =1 <br />• 1 — No legal authority exists <br />• 2 — Legal authority is unclear, uncertain or adoption is in progress <br />• 3 — Legal authority exists <br />• Potential Legal Challenge L =3 <br />• 3 — Low (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br />• 2 — Moderate (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br />• 1 — High (likelihood of legal challenge by stakeholders.) <br />• ECONOMIC (Multiple actions that are contingent upon each other will receive the <br />same ranking.) <br />• Action Benefit L =1 <br />• 1 — Low (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br />• 2 — Moderate (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br />• 3 — High (benefit to the jurisdiction from the action.) <br />• Action Cost L =3 <br />• 3 — High cost to implement action. <br />• 2 — Moderate cost to implement action. <br />• 1 — Low cost to implement action. <br />• Economic Goal Contribution L =1 <br />• 1 — Low contribution to other community economic goals. <br />• 2 — Moderate contribution to other community economic goals. <br />• 3 — High contribution to other community economic goals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.