Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES February 24, 2014 <br />DRAFT <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br />DATE : February 24, 2014 5 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 6 <br />TIME ENDED : 7:10 p.m. 7 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Kusterman, Rafferty, 8 <br /> Roeser, and Mayor Reinert 9 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : none 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael 13 <br />Grochala; Chief of Police John Swenson. 14 <br /> 15 <br />PUBLIC COMMENT 16 <br /> 17 <br />Ivy Cavegn, 311 Linda Lane, addressed the council regarding their recent decision on seceding from 18 <br />the Centennial Fire District. She offered information on the per capita cost of fire services, 19 <br />expenditure increase safeguards included in the contract with the District, and calculations on how 20 <br />costs are charged back to the city. She questions why the council felt the city needs majority veto 21 <br />power on the district steering committee. She also questions why there is no cost analysis nor has 22 <br />there been any community input on the establishment of a city fire department. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Adam LaMere, 7860 Lake Drive, addressed the council regarding the fire department and asked for 25 <br />more explanation of why the city would want to pull out of the Centennial District; more planning is 26 <br />needed. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Bill Neeck, 907 Oak Lane, noted concern about withdrawing from the fire district. He’s concerned 29 <br />about impact on the employees, residents and taxes. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mayor Reinert provided history on the city’s involvement with the fire district highlighting the growth 32 <br />of the city in 28 years, the intent of allowing for renegotiation as population grew, the unwillingness 33 <br />to allow for that renegotiation, and growth of fire department’s full time personnel. He explained 34 <br />the review that the council has already undertaken, including information and plans for equipment, 35 <br />insurance ratings and fire personnel. He explained the need for an additional fire station regardless 36 <br />of the split from the district. He read from what has already been published providing information 37 <br />including facts and responding to questions. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Roeser noted that the planning process for a new department will cover a two year 40 <br />period. This was a decision made over time and based on concern that has existed for some time. 41 <br />There are some fiscal responsibility concerns involved. This will be a journey and no plugs have been 42 <br />pulled yet but there is a clear goal to provide the best fire safety services possible. 43 <br /> 44 <br /> 45 <br />1