My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/06/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
08/06/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2014 1:09:52 PM
Creation date
3/14/2014 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/06/2007
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ordinances should be done in conjunction with a public education program. <br />Wind and evaporation during midday hours can remove up to 65% of <br />sprinkling water meant for your lawn. <br />3. New development approvals should minimize large open turf areas and <br />require organic soil augmentation for new turf areas on sandy soils. Many <br />cities require that a minimum of 4" of organic topsoil be placed on sandy soils <br />to slow infiltration. Lino Lakes currently requires a tree for each road <br />frontage, which the DNR recommends. <br />4. Automated sprinkling systems have increased in popularity and peak demands <br />have also increased with that popularity. Many communities have adopted <br />ordinances that require automated sprinkling systems to have rain sensors <br />installed, which prevent the operation of systems after an adequate amount of <br />precipitation has accumulated. The cost for a typical rain sensor is usually <br />$40 to $100. The savings in water charges from the use of a rain sensor could <br />pay for the rain sensor in the first season. It's estimated that a rain sensor will <br />save 1,225 gallons of water per household on every rainy day. <br />5. The City Council has authorized a more in depth study <br />to evaluate the water rate structure. <br />The DNR recommends the following: <br />a. Increasing block (rates that increase as consumption increases) rate <br />structures and seasonal surcharges (higher rates during months with peak <br />demands) with a minimum of $0.25 increments. <br />b. Customers that use more water and contribute to peak demands on the <br />system would pay higher water bills. These rate structures provide <br />incentives to use water efficiently and may be appropriate for generating <br />revenue for funding the construction of new wells or treatment facilities <br />that are required that to supply peak demands. <br />Requested Council Direction <br />We are requesting feedback from City Council as we continue to prepare the Water <br />Emergency and Conservation Plan for submittal to the DNR <br />5 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.