Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT 8 -17 -07 <br />XIII. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS <br />TKDA was authorized to conduct a water treatment feasibility study for the City of Lino <br />Lakes. As part of this study, the water quality information on each well was reviewed. Lino <br />Lakes' water supply meets all primary drinking water regulations. There are two <br />contaminates in the water that are of concern, iron and manganese. The maximum <br />secondary contaminate level for iron is 0.03 mg /I and for manganese is 0.05 mg /I. <br />The secondary contaminant levels are voluntary as they are there for aesthetics reasons. <br />High iron causes red staining and high manganese causes black staining in laundry and <br />household fixtures. Three of the existing wells are above the recommended secondary <br />contaminant levels for iron, and four are above the recommended levels for manganese. <br />The actual levels are on page 5. The levels are not extremely high and are not generating <br />a large number of complaints. <br />In order to determine a plant size and cost, we next estimated what the ultimate future <br />demand for water will be in Lino Lakes. This demand level was determined using current <br />trends, Minnesota DNR future requirements for conservation, and ultimate population <br />projections. The Table on page 7 shows three scenarios. The ultimate peak day demand <br />used for this study is 10.4 MGD. <br />TKDA reviewed three (3) potential future water treatment plant sites. Of these, the two <br />most viable were studied and soil borings were taken. The two (2) sites are a school <br />district parcel at Birch Street, west of Timberlake Trail, and property the City owns on the <br />Southeast corner of Centerville Road and Birch Street. Costs for developing a plant at <br />each site were determined with the school district site being the lower cost alternative. <br />A further look was taken at future storage needs. In 2004, a Comprehensive Water Study <br />was completed by TKDA. This study projected to the year 2030 and recommended 1 MG <br />of additional storage for a population of 32,000. In this study we have a total population of <br />42,000, about 1/3 more. Therefore, we are recommending 1.5 MG or 2.0 MG storage. <br />A ground storage tank with raw water supply is planned for the central part of the City, <br />whether there is a treatment plant there or not. The ground storage tank will require a <br />booster station to boost the water from the ground reservoirs to the two elevated water <br />towers. The booster station was sized in Chapter IV. <br />Water Treatment Plant Study 23 13843.000 <br />