My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/04/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
04/04/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2014 3:44:03 PM
Creation date
3/21/2014 12:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/04/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />WS — Item 2 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 2 <br />Date: January 4, 2010 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Mary Alice Divine <br />Re: Update on Legacy Project <br />Background <br />In 2007 the undeveloped properties owned by Hartford Group, the master developer of <br />the Legacy at Woods Edge downtown project, went into foreclosure. The mortgage for <br />the properties is held by a consortium of banks. The redemption period for the properties <br />ends in May 2010, at which time they will go into tax forfeit. <br />Staff has met with representatives from OSM, the current loan servicer, and the <br />commercial broker from CB Richard Ellis who was retained by OSM to market the <br />property. The representatives from OSM indicated that the consortium has no interest in <br />redeeming the properties. To do so they would need to pay off the back taxes and <br />assessments, interest and penalties. They contend that the property values have dropped <br />below the redemption amount and due to the current economy, any buyer would likely <br />have to carry costs on the land for 3 -5 years before development may occur. <br />Staff and consulting attorney, Steve Bubul of Kennedy & Graven, have discussed options <br />regarding the future of the properties. When the properties go tax forfeit, the back taxes <br />are wiped clean, but the city can, at any time, place the assessments back on. The city has <br />first rights to the property after forfeit; however, the city must demonstrate that it will be <br />used for public purposes only. If the city does not take the property, or purchase the <br />property at a value determined by the County Board, it will eventually be put up for <br />public auction. This process can take considerable time. <br />City staff and Mr. Bubul met with staff from Anoka County Property Tax Division in <br />December. Mr. Bubul discussed the potential for obtaining a "deed in lieu" of forfeiture <br />to avoid the necessity of forfeiture. He and the county have worked through such a <br />transaction in the past, so there is precedent for this to occur. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.