|
•
<br />•
<br />minimum area allowance without exceeding the next level's minimum. For comparison
<br />the percentages used are 3.74 %. 3.31%, 1.92 %, 1.14% and 1.14 %. This keeps each
<br />level from exceeding the maximum of the level above.
<br />This option is slightly more complicated, but could be the most equitable option for
<br />distributing Accessory Structure Area. A comparison of the current and each of the two
<br />proposed options is included in the following table.
<br />Lot Size
<br />(s.f.)
<br />Current
<br />Ordinance
<br />Allowance
<br />(s.f.)
<br />Option A
<br />Allowance
<br />(flat %)
<br />(s.f.)
<br />Option B
<br />Allowance
<br />(stepped %)
<br />(s.f.)
<br />Less than 1.25 Acre
<br />Parcel A
<br />10,800
<br />1,200
<br />480 1,200
<br />404 1,200
<br />Parcel B*
<br />54,014
<br />1,200
<br />2,004
<br />2,020
<br />1.25 to 2.5 Acres
<br />Parcel A
<br />54,450
<br />2,020
<br />2,020
<br />1.802 2,020
<br />Parcel B **
<br />Parcel B*
<br />108,464
<br />2,020
<br />4,024
<br />3,590
<br />2.5 to 5 Acres
<br />Parcel A
<br />108,900
<br />3,600
<br />4,040
<br />2,091 3,600
<br />Parcel B **
<br />Parcel B*
<br />217,364
<br />3,600
<br />8,064
<br />4,173
<br />5 to 10 Acres
<br />Parcel A
<br />217,800
<br />4,200
<br />8,080
<br />2,183 4,200
<br />Parcel B **
<br />Parcel B*
<br />435,164
<br />4,200
<br />16,145
<br />4,961
<br />10 to 20 Acres
<br />Parcel A
<br />435,600
<br />5,000
<br />16,161
<br />5,000
<br />Parcel B **
<br />Parcel B*
<br />870,764
<br />5,000
<br />32,305
<br />9,927
<br />20 Acres or Greater
<br />Parcel A
<br />871,200
<br />Unlimited
<br />32,322
<br />9,932
<br />Parcel B **
<br />1,742,400
<br />Unlimited
<br />64,643
<br />19,863
<br />* Parcel B is 0.10 acres short of reaching the next threshold.
<br />* *Parcel B is 40 acres.
<br />Can another option based on percentage of lot size allow a
<br />more evenly applied ordinance? And if so, should the city
<br />pursue one of the two options shown here?
<br />
|