My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/07/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
06/07/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2014 1:40:32 PM
Creation date
3/25/2014 10:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/07/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
warning device. First, I suggest that a warning should be placed anywhere there is a hidden <br />condition from the motorist. And second, the city based on available resources (i.e., money and <br />employees), should establish in their policy what streets or conditions will receive warnings, <br />perhaps only the streets rated as poor in you pavement management plan. In addition, the city <br />may wish to pay special attention to areas involving complaints or accidents. The city's policy <br />should have procedures for responding to notice of complaints and accidents. If the city <br />ultimately decides that no action is necessary, the city should at least document the situation to <br />show that it followed its policy. <br />I hope that the above information adequately answers your questions. If you need additional <br />information, please let me know. <br />Christopher Smith <br />Risk Management Attorney <br />League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust <br />(651) 281 -1269 <br />csmith[c�lmnc.orq <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.