Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 3, 2008 <br />APPROVED <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />: March 3, 2008 <br />. 5:30 p.m. <br />. 7:45 p.m. <br />: Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />Reinert, Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson <br />: None <br />Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Director of Public Safety, <br />Dave Pecchia; Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; City Engineer, Jim <br />Studenski; City Clerk, Julie Bartell. <br />POLICE UPDATE <br />Police Chief Pecchia reported that the Lino Lakes Police Department assisted a Kansas <br />city police department (on February 29, 2008) in the arrest of an individual accused of an <br />Internet related crime against children. The individual is a janitor at Centennial Middle <br />School. The Lino Lakes Police Department investigated and they do not believe there <br />has been any related problems at the school. <br />CHARTER AMENDMENT — Steve Bubul, Kennedy & Graven, was present and <br />outlined his most recent correspondence regarding clarification of the impact of various <br />charter amendment alternatives on the ability of the city to issue tax - exempt bonds for <br />improvements. Having exempt areas does create differing rights among property owners <br />and therefore the easiest way to deal with the question would be to remove the exempt <br />zones. Mr. Bubul was asked about the possibility of removing the zones from the <br />Charter Task Force proposal. <br />It was noted that historically the exempt zones were established due to the commercial or <br />anticipated commercial nature of those areas, to deal with the few residential properties <br />located therein. Those zones are exempt from the charter provisions and assessments are <br />basically handled under Chapter 429 rules. The Charter Task Force proposal would add <br />a right to those residential properties to opt out of an improvement project, a right they <br />don't have under Chapter 429 rules. If the zones were removed, the ability of those <br />residential property owners to opt out would change but if it is a situation that absolutely <br />does not benefit the property, generally they can and should not be assessed anyway. <br />The council discussed the implication of changes to larger land holders and was informed <br />that there are generally deferment provisions on undeveloped land. <br />The Mayor noted that the council will need to move in some direction if there is a desire <br />to forward a charter amendment to the voters this fall. <br />