My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/06/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
07/06/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 2:59:05 PM
Creation date
3/26/2014 12:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/06/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 3, 2009 <br />APPROVED <br />131 the council for direction on the parameters of a JPA and also on the matter of the impact of the charter <br />132 provisions. <br />133 Attorney Langel suggested that the city will have to deal with a decision about how a petition will be <br />134 viewed if in fact one is submitted. <br />135 The council had general agreement with the parameters of the JPA that had been presented. <br />136 <br />137 5. Liquor License Investigation Fee — City Clerk Bartell reviewed the report before the council <br />138 regarding the city's practice and charges for liquor license background investigations. The process has <br />139 come under review since one renewal applicant is refusing to pay the fee for the annual background <br />140 investigation. The city attorney is suggesting that the council reinforce the rationale and the city code. <br />141 language if they wish to continue the requirement for investigations for renewal applicants. <br />142 The council concurred that annual investigation is a good practice and they would like to continue that. <br />143 Staff was directed to prepare a resolution that reinforces the practice and also prepare the appropriate <br />144 code amendment (to be considered as part of the recodification approval). <br />145 The council suggested that it may be appropriate to rework how the investigation cost is charged, perhaps <br />146 by adding it into the license fee. <br />147 <br />148 Review Regular Agenda - City Planner Smyser reviewed Item 6A, second reading of an ordinance. He <br />149 provided requested information on what other cities are doing in the same area. While zoning districts <br />150 can be titled or separated differently in cities, it appears that most cities do allow the situation staff is <br />151 presenting for this city. The city's Economic Development Advisory Committee will also be offering an <br />152 opinion as of the end of the week. <br />153 A council member noted concern about "shoddy" church -type operations that could take advantage of the <br />154 change. It would be preferable to consider individual situations as they come forward. Staff pointed out <br />155 that the city isn't allowed to grant variances to zoning. <br />156 The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. <br />157 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council meeting held on August 24, <br />158 2009. <br />159 <br />160 <br />161 <br />162 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.