Laserfiche WebLink
WS — Item 6 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 6 <br />Date: Council Work Session, September 7, 2010 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala <br />Re: Comprehensive Plan Review <br />Background <br />The City Council reviewed proposed changes to Land Use and Housing chapters of the draft <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan at the August 11, 2010 work session. The council proposed the <br />following changes: <br />• Chapter 3, Land Use Plan (pages 26 -27). Modification of the proposed statement within <br />the Growth Management Policy establishing an annual average of 230 new residential <br />dwelling units per year. The council reduced the maximum number of residential units <br />allowed in any one year The proposed language now reads: <br />"The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over <br />each 5 year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 <br />year phasing period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year <br />phase." <br />• Chapter 4, Housing Plan (pages 10 -11). No additional changes were proposed. <br />The proposed Land Use Plan changes are intended to address council concerns regarding <br />establishment of hard growth cap, providing development flexibility, managing pace of growth, <br />and maintaining even grow from year to year while still accommodating the growth forecasts. <br />Upon final approval of the Comprehensive Plan the city's existing Growth Management <br />ordinance would be amended to incorporate these changes. <br />Staff submitted the proposed language to Metropolitan Council staff for preliminary review on <br />August 25, 2010. The City has been informed that the proposed modifications would not change <br />Metropolitan Councils official review of the plan. Therefore the proposed changes would not <br />require additional review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. However, it was noted that <br />the proposed changes to the Housing Chapter has the potential to prevent the City from <br />participating in the Livable Communities Act program. Staff believes adoption of the resolution <br />electing to participate in the LCA program will negate this concern. Staff is confirming with <br />Metropolitan Council staff. <br />1 <br />