My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/04/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
10/04/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 2:09:26 PM
Creation date
3/31/2014 11:39:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/04/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Get as much feedback as practical from employees, including what they think are the <br />problems and what should be done to resolve them. <br />3. Know why we're making any changes. What goals do we hope to accomplish? <br />4. Keep perspective. There is no "silver bullet" that will completely turn the organization <br />around and make things better for everyone all the time. <br />5. Keep focused on delivering services to the residents as cost effectively and efficiently as <br />possible. <br />6. Successful change must involve management staff and the City Council. <br />7. Include closure in the plan. <br />Components of the organizational assessment would include the following: <br />1. A benchmarking study of city positions to see how Lino Lakes compares with other cities of <br />similar size and characteristics. <br />2. A review of the City's organizational structure, which would include going over job <br />descriptions with the department directors and individual employees to determine if their job <br />descriptions still reflect the duties and responsibilities they perform on a regular basis. This will <br />expose any redundancy in the organization. <br />3. An examination of the City's internal processes and systems. This drills down to the how, <br />what, and why questions. How do we change from System Y to System Z? How do we get <br />people assume more responsibility, to be more creative? What are we trying to accomplish? <br />What changes are necessary? What indicators will signal success? What standards apply? What <br />measures of performance are we trying to affect? Why do we do what we do? Why do we do it <br />the way we do it? Asking "why" questions gets to the ultimate purposes of people. The term <br />"system" can be defined as an arrangement of resources and routines intended to produce <br />specific results. In that context, you look at both the "hard" systems (e.g., computer -based <br />information systems) and the "soft" systems (e.g., compensation plan, appraisal system). <br />One additional component might be to hire a consultant to administer an organizational <br />assessment instrument, which generally involves personal interviews, surveys, and <br />questionnaires to identify positive and negative influences, to provide a "gap" analysis, and to <br />impart directional recommendations. There are many organizational assessment tools that would <br />provide information as to how well the City's critical elements are working together to achieve <br />its strategic goals and missions. <br />Two basic questions that organizations often ask are: "How do we know that resources are being <br />properly allocated, and how can we better utilize our limited resources." It's these two questions <br />that should move us to examine the whole issue of what the important elements are which <br />contribute to organizational success. <br />Requested Council Direction <br />Staff is seeking further direction from the Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.