Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/08/2010 Council PacketCITY OUNCIL AGENDA, Council Agenda EXPANDED AGENDA November 8, 2010 Monday, November 8, 2010 xxxxxxxxxxx 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Gallup, Roeser, & Rafferty City Administrator: Jeff Karlson ➢ Call to Order — 6:30 p.m. ➢ Roll Call - Council Members Gallup, O'Donnell, Rafferty, Roeser & Mayor Reinert ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Open Mike / Public Comment Tony Cavegn, 592 Lois Lane, noted concern about possible budget cuts ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items No changes to agenda U ICIPAL CANVASSING), G.. 1. 2010 Election Results: Consider acceptance of municipal canvassing board report declaring the results of the November 2, 2010 election Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Roeser, to accept the results as presented, was adopted A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) November 8, 2010 (Check No. 89430 through 89551) in the amount of $153,999.14; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 4541 through 4555) in the amount of $4,050.42 Pg 3 -16 B) Consider approval of October 25, 2010 Work Session Minutes Pg 17 -19 C) Consider approval of October 25, 2010 Council Meeting Minutes Pg 20 -22 D) Consider Resolution No. 10 -102, Approving Mn Metro North Tourism Bureau 2011 Budget Action Taken: Motion by Gallup, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1D, was adopted ANCE DEPARTMENT REPO No Report Council Agenda -2- EXPANDED AGENDA AD MIST 3N DEPAR' No Report PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTME:±IT, November 8, 2010 A) Hearing to consider the appeal of Mitchell and Andra Sawh, Pg 23 -30 1366 Wolf Circle to a dangerous dog designation Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by O'Donnell, to affirm the dangerous dog designation, was adopted. Motion by Gallup, seconded by Roeser, to require the dog owner(s) to follow any and all of the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 347.50 through 347.56 with the addition of requirements to include the city as additional insured on the insurance policy and notification of neighbors in the immediate area as advised by the city, was adopted. Council Members O'Donnell and Rafferty voted no. IC SERVICES"' A) No Report NITY DEVELO zfal Consider Resolution No. 10 -99, Approving Final Payment, 2010 Street Sealcoat Project, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Gallup, to approve Resolution No. 10 -99 as presented, was adopted B) Consider Resolution No. 10 -100 Authorizing Application to the 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant, Marty Asleson Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve Resolution No. 10 -100 as presented, was adopted C) Consider Resolution No. 10 — 101 Approving Amendment to Marshan Meadows Development Contract, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Gallup, seconded by Rafferty to approve Resolution No. 10 -101 as presented, was adopted Pg 31 -37 INIS None None Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Roeser, to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Council Agenda -3- EXPANDED AGENDA November 8, 2010 ����� Community Calendar- A Look Ahead November 9, 2010 through November 22, 2010 Wednesday, November 10 Wednesday, November 10 Thursday, November 11 Monday, November 22 Monday, November 22 6:15 pm, Community Room 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Veterans Day 5:30 pm, Community Room 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Council Work Session Planning & Zoning City Hall Closed Council Work Session City Council Meeting • • • AGENDA ITEM 1 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Canvass Election Returns VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statute 205.185 requires that the governing body of a city conducting an election shall act as the canvassing board, canvass the returns and declare the results of the election between the third and tenth days after the election. Included with this agenda item are the returns of the November 2, 2010 Lino Lakes Special Election. OPTIONS: 1. Move to accept the report as it appears. 2. Reject the report RECOMMENDATION: Option #1 m r- 0 m n cc Cn O g C m N D O xi 1_ D O0 m m • 'Total # Voters H 0 D.) z 0 Total - Yes City Question ITotal AB's Overvote Blank z 0 Yes 'Absentee- Anoka County Counts 'Voted In Person on Election Day I Overvote 'Blank z 0 Yes CITY QUESTION- ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR CERTAI (Total # of Reg. Voters # of Persons Registering on Election Day I# of Reg. Persons at 7 a.m. CO CO _. CA) CO v .A 01 -.I C.J N) --• O _a -� 20 CO 01 CD 1 CA) 01 W CO 0) 437 N CO CD 00 O Nk CD 7 I 1290 0) O CO 0) O CO - 01 O — N CO — 01 1245', C31 0) -J 580 593 CO C�) 0) N — 1815 Pr. #2 1088 CA CO - - 449 0) 01 O O 18 — 1053 O Ni 0) 01 CO 01 4321 1597 v DD 01 -� CD 0 Z It (,1 742 CO -� 0) — O �I 0 0) C31 0) 45 1504 0) I 47 0) Cb 0) -J 0) OJ 22561 (0 2127 Pr. #4 857 389 425 �I O Ni O CO 820 Ni CD 373 406 1223 A O 13 7 1310 781 471 82 O 01 55 N 1228, GO O1 O v N CA 449 O -� 00 J C3) 1842 7 - CO Co 546 922 0) Ni O Ni Ni -.I CA.) C,) 1436 -• N �I 01 ---• CD CO 00 CD 2055, cD O CD 0) 01 Z it 8545 O -I -,I 4145 400 — -1. 0) Ni _a N --• �I -x 8145 — 01 Ni CO --• 3865 0) CD 12284 0) 01 00 116261 TOTAL m r- 0 m n cc Cn O g C m N D O xi 1_ D O0 m m • • • • IleuuoQ O I4OC J ulay J4 F aasaoej anew o � cD CD 5. CD o CD v s< O o CD o C CD CD n Q E C7 a c) n. --o m n 5 CQ co O Q CD G 5 N CD CD c 3 CD CD Q CD X Sv 3 CD D O CD 0_ O- D ELT 0 CD Q lnO -uanl • EXPENDITURES NOVEMBER 8, 2010 • • Date: 10/29/2010 Time 08:42:06 Ranges: Operator: KKF Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (r) 8930 Bank #: (A) Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y Page on Department: N Department Vendor Name - 8933 # of copies: 1 Description ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ELECTIONS ELECTIONS ELECTIONS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR CENTRAL PENSION FUND DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MN DEPT OF LABOR /IND MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY HEALTH PARTNERS Total for MONTHLY INSURANCE PREMIU MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU IUOE CONTRIBUTIONS NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE 3RD QTR 2010 PERMIT SURC BRIAN C HRONSKI #0014011 NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Department RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES ORDINANCE 11 -10 PUBLICAT NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 402 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT ELECTIONS SUPPLIES PRESS PUBLICATIONS, NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTI PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PUBLIC ACCURACY TEST PUB Total for Department 403 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM MN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS Total for MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU MONTHLY PHONES CHARGES NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Department 406 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MATT PARROTT AND SON MATT PARROTT AND SON MATT PARROTT AND SON MATT PARROTT AND SON LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS Total for MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE 1099 LASER FORMS /W2 LASE CREDIT DUE TO STACKING LASER AP CHECKS LASER P/R CHECKS NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Department 407 Amount 429.24 1,243.44 3,388.80 2,471.04 3,087.26 698.47 6,027.52 17,345.77* 15.00 150.02 17.43 115.28 84.63 2,448.52 2,830.88* 36.72 99.38 19.88 155.98* 3.75 36.76 23.44 17.43 6.44 343.73 431.55* 11.26 112.49 169.81 -70.90 457.34 303.37 56.79 1,781.48 2,821.64* • Date: 10/29/2010 Time 08:42:06 Operator: KKF • Department Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount LEGAL CONSULTANTS SWEENEY, MURPHY & SW OCT. 2010 PROSECUTION SE Total for Department 414 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & ZONING PLANNING & ZONING PLANNING & ZONING PLANNING & ZONING COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE ICE CE CE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE • RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU MN METRO NORTH TOURI SEPT. 2010 HOTEL -MOTEL T HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 415 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 416 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU Total for Department 418 ANOKA COUNTY CENTRAL DAKOTA COUNTY RECEIV DAKOTA COUNTY RECEIV RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM MN TARGET BANK ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASPEN MILLS, INC. VERIZON WIRELESS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF XCEL ENERGY EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, IN MINNESOTA SHREDDING CRABTREE COMPANIES, STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF PLEAA BLAUER TACTICAL SYST SEPT. 2010 INTERNET ACCE AUGUST 2010 DETOX TRANSP JULY 2010 DETOX TRANSPOR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU MONTHLY PHONES CHARGES EXPLORERS OPEN HOUSE /SHR B. YOUNG UNIFORM ALLOWAN C. BRAGELMAN UNIFORM ALL C. SCHIRMERS UNIFORM ALL D HAGER UNIFORM ALLOWANC D. J. K. K. M. HAGER UNIFORM ALLOWAN MCINTOSH UNIFORM ALLO MCCARTHY UNIFORM ALLO STREGE UNIFORM ALLOWA RUMPSA UNIFORM ALLOWA POLICE RESERVES T. NOLL UNIFORM ALLOWANC MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES TROUBLESHOOT & REPAIR SI CONFIDENTIAL DATA SHREDD ANNUAL RENEWAL OF QF BAR C. BOEHME UNIFORM ALLOWA M. PAULSON UNIFORM ALLOW NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU L. HAWKINSON - PLEAA FALL SPEAR OPERATOR SIM COURS 10,744.27 10,744.27* 3.75 37.50 19.22 5,362.00 549.96 5,972.43* 7.50 75.00 36.26 1,099.92 1,218.68* 11.25 56.26 17.43 47.52 132.46* 432.28 67.00 67.00 108.75 678.20 39.31 394.44 94.34 94.34 269.50 460.23 94.34 98.45 356.22 30.78 49.90 94.34 905.49 444.81 3.39 101.03 46.50 344.67 98.33 26.71 453.16 25.00 750.00 Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:42:06 Operator: KKF Department Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 420 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 421 BUILDING INSPECTIONS RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU BUILDING INSPECTIONS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE BUILDING INSPECTIONS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES BUILDING INSPECTIONS LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU BUILDING INSPECTIONS HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 422 STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONES CHARGES BROCK WHITE, INC. CRAFCO RENTAL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE EARL F. ANDERSEN, IN 9" STREET SIGN PLANTES NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY PAGER CHARGES XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SO SEPT. 2010 AC FINE ASPHA WRIGHT /HENNEPIN CO -O MONTHLY STREET LIGHT MAI LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU QWEST SIGNAL PHONE MONTHLY CHA HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 430 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR BAUER BUILT, INC. BAUER BUILT, INC. O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA FACTORY MOTOR PARTS FACTORY MOTOR PARTS FACTORY MOTOR PARTS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTI ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF WYCO INC dba MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU ROLLER TRAILER TIRES 11R225 BATTERY BATTERY RETURNED LOOM TOOL OIL FILTERS) PINION SEAL RETURNED SOLENOID NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE AIR HOSE MENDERS BATTERIES FOR SIRENS BATTERY & CORE CHRG CORE RETURN 7 PIN HD RD 7 RV VEHICLE REGISTRATION /200 STEEL OUTSIDE RANDOM NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 10FT SVC CORD /NUT DRIVER 19,909.69 26,538.20* 11.25 75.00 52.34 1,556.65 1,695.24* 8.62 93.75 34.86 39.01 1,018.23 1,194.47* 25.69 36.84 728.62 219.38 76.42 142.36 3.20 4,842.77 150.42 990.00 100.18 52.15 3,006.27 10,374.30* 3.00 505.12 1,292.40 104.19 -12.83 5.54 112.43 -15.13 10.68 43.12 8.62 182.97 91.49 -21.00 32.13 47.25 14.96 17.45 23.51 Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:42:06 Operator: KKF • Department FLEET Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS OS: rte. 3 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL • HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 431 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APP NORTHERN AIR CORPORA RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM MN C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT CENTENNIAL UTILITIES DALCO, INC. DALCO, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF TWIN CITY GARAGE DOO LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF PIONEER PRESS HEALTH PARTNERS MONTHLY RUG /MAT REPLACEM REPAIR PNEUMATICS - LABO MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU MONTHLY PHONES CHARGES MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES WEEKLY PLANNER(S) SEPT 2010 GAS CHARGES HOSE DRAIN MOPPING SYSTEM /FLAT MOP NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE PREVENT MAINT. ON ALL DO NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DAILY & SUNDAY PRINT SUB NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for D RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT M HUGO FEED MILL, INC. LICHTSCHEIDL, DAVE XCEL ENERGY SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRI WALDOCH SPORTS, INC. GREAT NORTHERN LANDS LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I ON SITE SANITATION I HEALTH PARTNERS epartment 432 MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES ATHLETIC FIELD STRIPPING 5# OMEGA GOPHER GRAIN BA CLOTHING ALLOWANCE REIMS MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES GIS SERVICES TECHNICAL & PARTS CATALO WINTERIZATION AT LEGACY NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU BIRCH PARK UNIT RENT CENTENNIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL CLEARWATER CREEK PARK UN LINO PARK UNIT RENT MARSHAN PARK UNIT RENT RICE LAKE ELEMENTARY UNI SUNRISE PARK UNIT RENT NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 450 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 451 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU ASLESON, MARTY PARKING /PLANT MATERIALS ASLESON, MARTY WATER RESOURCES CONFEREN Amount 880.33 3,326.23* 249.28 314.52 3.75 119.75 562.43 19.31 1,823.94 72.14 171.53 37.50 440.00 12.00 234.00 549.96 4,610.11* 20.64 168.76 254.44 128.89 37.35 189.03 159.00 249.47 121.97 867.00 93.46 86.22 162.44 75.92 86.22 86.22 243.66 248.66 3,219.06 6,498.41* 12.00 120.02 17.43 46.52 1,275.99 1,471.96* 4.12 20.00 44.00 Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:42:06 Operator: KKF Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount ENVIRONMENTAL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE 13.13 ENVIRONMENTAL NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES 34.86 ENVIRONMENTAL LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 13.65 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS 530.65 Total for Department 461 660.41* SOLID WASTE RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 1.13 SOLID WASTE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE 11.25 SOLID WASTE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 5.85 SOLID WASTE HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS 164.98 Total for Department 462 183.21* FORESTRY RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 2.25 FORESTRY ASLESON, MARTY PARKING /PLANT MATERIALS 8.99 FORESTRY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE 13.13 FORESTRY LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU 6.82 FORESTRY HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS 192.49 Total for Department 463 223.68* Total for Fund 101 98,429.88* GROESS, RON COACHES REFUND 45.00 LINDERS, DAN COACHES REFUND 50.00 DEGEEST, SETH COACHES REFUND 45.00 FARRIS, JIM COACHES REFUND 45.00 BORDSON, BRENT COACHES REFUND 45.00 SCHOEBERL, KAYLENE COACHES REFUND 55.00 THORESON, STEVE COACHES REFUND 45.00 LOVICK, DAVE COACHES REFUND 25.00 AUDETTE, JON COACHES REFUND 45.00 MUNSON, DAVID COACHES REFUND 115.00 WOOLF, TODD COACHES REFUND 45.00 ANDERSON, TOM COACHES REFUND 27.50 BRAND, JON COACHES REFUND 22.50 CLASEMAN, MATT COACHES REFUND 55.00 ENNETT, LARRY COACHES REFUND 45.00 HALVA, ROB COACHES REFUND 82.50 HAMSKI, DAN COACHES REFUND 45.00 LINDSAY, CHAD COACHES REFUND 67.50 SCHLUENDER, DAN COACHES REFUND 95.00 STRUEBING, MIKE COACHES REFUND 45.00 LARSON, ERIC COACHES REFUND 27.50 CASE, LARRY COACHES REFUND 55.00 NELSON, ERIC COACHES REFUND 22.50 GUYER, LORI COACHES REFUND 60.00 MONSON, MISSY COACHES REFUND 60.00 HORVAT, JIM COACHES REFUND 55.00 BREUNIG, STEVEN COACHES REFUND 22.50 JACKSON, RICK FOOTBALL COACH 37.50 BERGER, JIM COACHES REFUND 22.50 Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:42:06 Operator: KKF • Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount VANZEE, SCOTT COACHES REFUND 22.50 LEWIS, JENNY COACHES REFUND 45.00 SCHNEIDER, GREGORY COACHES REFUND 55.00 STOKS, TRAVIS COACHES REFUND 27.50 HENRY, PATRICK COACHES REFUND 45.00 PETERSON, THOMAS /LAU COACHES REFUND 45.00 VANZYL, MARIA COACHES REFUND 45.00 ESKIEVKA, BEN COACHES REFUND 22.50 KELLS, STEPHEN COACHES REFUND 45.00 HELVIG, CHRISTEN COACHES REFUND 55.00 VERKE, JUSTIN COACHES REFUND 55.00 MCMILLIN, TOM COACHES REFUND 45.00 CLAMPITT, CARA COACHES REFUND 22.50 HOVE, MARK COACHES REFUND 27.50 ANDERSON, TODD COACHES REFUND 55.00 AUSTIN, MARTIN COACHES REFUND 50.00 LINSER, BOB COACHES REFUND 50.00 BRAUSEN, TIM COACHES REFUND 30.00 PIERCE, SERENA COACHES REFUND 50.00 Total for Department 2,200.00* YOUTH SPORTS GUYER, LORI COACHES CLINIC 125.00 Total for Department 208 125.00* Total for Fund 201 2,325.00* OTHER AID ELECTRIC SERVICE LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJEC 11,000.00 • Total for Department 499 11,000.00* Total for Fund 401 11,000.00* FLEET ZAHL PETROLEUM MAINT DELIVER,SETUP,INSTALL LI 8,445.00 FLEET CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPAN DEBRIS BLOWER - TOOLCAT AT 6,785.49 Total for Department 431 15,230.49* Total for Fund 402 15,230.49* OTHER PEARSON BROTHERS, IN 2010 SEALCOAT FINAL PAYM 6,488.50 Total for Department 499 6,488.50* Total for Fund 421 6,488.50* OTHER PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PINE STREET PUBLIC HEARI 79.50 Total for Department 499 79.50* Total for Fund 423 79.50* BLAINE, CITY OF 3RD QTR 2010 -WATER USEAG 44.52 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION C HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT RE - 180.60 Total for Department - 136.08* • Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:42:06 Operator: KKF Department Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER FERGUSON WATERWORKS RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR INTERSTATE POWER SYS TDS METROCOM MN BLAINE, CITY OF C. W. HOULE, INC. CONCRETE PRESSURE LI CIRCLE PINES POST OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION AMERICAN MESSAGING XCEL ENERGY WILLIAMS, JUSTIN BALL CORP STOP /DI & SS S MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU SEMI - ANNUAL GENERATOR IN MONTHLY PHONES CHARGES 3RD QTR 2010 -WATER USEAG REPAIR WATERMAIN AT 1554 REPAIR LIFT STATION # 10 MONTHLY UTILITY BILLING NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES MONTHLY PAGER CHARGES MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES BATTERIES PLUS BALANCE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU HEALTH PARTNERS NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 494 Total for Fund 601 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR INTERSTATE POWER SYS INTERSTATE POWER SYS BLAINE, CITY OF CONCRETE PRESSURE LI CIRCLE PINES POST OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION TRI STATE PUMP AND C AMERICAN MESSAGING XCEL ENERGY WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS 1/8 ALUM FORMED 6X6X88 & MOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU FLEX FUEL SS BRAIDED SEMI - ANNUAL GENERATOR IN 3RD QTR 2010 -WATER USEAG REPAIR LIFT STATION # 10 MONTHLY UTILITY BILLING NOVEMBER 2010 DENTAL PRE MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES REPAIR LIFT # 1 /MATERIAL MONTHLY PAGER CHARGES MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES 3/4" BLK PIPE PLAIN END/ NOVEMBER 2010 INS PREMIU NOVEMBER 2010 HEALTH INS Total for Department 495 Total for Fund 602 ASPEN MILLS, INC. BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN SWEENEY, BORER, & SW LUNDA CONSTRUCTION C UPPER MIDWEST COMMUN BADGES CN 10- 238907/1989 DODGE CN 10- 239790/1993 NISSAN CN 10- 244153/1999 FORD T FORFEITURE SERVICES HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT RE INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTI Total for Department Total for Fund B01 Grand Total 200.27 8.07 275.00 110.23 662.68 1,110.00 437.50 350.87 193.33 59.79 12.77 2,601.57 11.29 33.16 1,290.49 7,357.02* 7,220.94* 272.37 8.03 48.09 560.11 1,341.00 437.50 350.86 80.62 50.50 2,331.54 3.20 1,836.39 67.98 33.13 1,290.51 8,711.83* 8,711.83* 2,264.10 223.30 130.76 130.76 614.08 400.00 750.00 4,513.00* 4,513.00* 153,999.14* • • Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:43:25 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal �nges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 8928 - 8932 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: KKF Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: A Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 11,000.00 11,000.00 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 429.24 429.24 .00 .00 002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING 1 19.17 19.17 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 249.28 249.28 .00 .00 008188 ANDERSON, TODD 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 007602 ANDERSON, TOM 1 27.50 27.50 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY CENTRAL COMMICATIONS 1 432.28 432.28 .00 .00 004063 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 1 47.25 47.25 .00 .00 000490 ASLESON, MARTY 2 72.99 72.99 .00 .00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 16 4,300.98 4,300.98 .00 .00 •322 1 AUDETTE, JON 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 89 AUSTIN, MARTIN 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 2 1,797.52 1,797.52 .00 .00 008173 BERGER, JIM 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 2,048.20 2,048.20 .00 .00 007849 BLAUER TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 1 750.00 750.00 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 3 484.82 484.82 .00 .00 001018 BORDSON, BRENT 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 007603 BRAND, JON 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 008191 BRAUSEN, TIM 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 008094 BREUNIG, STEVEN 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 1 728.62 728.62 .00 .00 • Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:43:25 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KKP Page: 2 DiSCOun Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount L 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 618.46 618.46 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 1,110.00 1,110.00 .00 .00 007888 CASE, LARRY 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 001110 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 1 1,823.94 1,823.94 .00 .00 000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 3,388.80 3,388.80 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 701.73 701.73 .00 .00 008186 CLAMPITT, CARA 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 007606 CLASEMAN, MATT 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 001051 CONCRETE PRESSURE LIFTING, INC. 1 875.00 875.00 .00 .00 003980 CRABTREE COMPANIES, INC. 1 344.67 344.67 .00 .00 000849 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY, INC 1 6,785.49 6,785.49 .00 .00 000413 DAKOTA COUNTY RECEIVING CENTER 2 134.00 134.00 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 2 243.67 243.67 .00 .00 000778 DEGEEST, SETH 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,439.55 4,439.55 .00 .00 001380 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC 1 76.42 76.42 .00 410 003521 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. 1 101.03 101.03 .00 007608 ENNETT, LARRY 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 008181 ESKIEVKA, BEN 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 4 253.46 253.46 .00 .00 000792 FARRIS, JIM 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 000022 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1 200.27 200.27 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 8.62 8.62 .00 .00 007225 GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPE, INC. 1 867.00 867.00 .00 .00 000319 GROESS, RON 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 007896 GUYER, LORI 2 185.00 185.00 .00 .00 007613 HALVA, ROB 1 82.50 82.50 .00 .00 • Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:43:26 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KKF Page: 3 Discount •br # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 007614 HAMSKI, DAN 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 900559 HEALTH PARTNERS 1 47,136.43 47,136.43 .00 .00 008183 HELVIG, CHRISTEN 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 008178 HENRY, PATRICK 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 001847 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING,IN 1 128.89 128.89 .00 .00 007902 HORVAT, JIM 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 008187 HOVE, MARK 1 27.50 27.50 .00 .00 003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1 32.13 32.13 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL, INC. 1 37.35 37.35 .00 .00 000476 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 4 883.20 883.20 .00 .00 008163 JACKSON, RICK 1 37.50 37.50 .00 .00 006182 KELLS, STEPHEN 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 007887 LARSON, ERIC 1 27.50 27.50 .00 .00 008175 LEWIS, JENNY 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 002330 LICHTSCHEIDL, DAVE 1 189.03 189.03 .00 .00 S 701 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO 1 1,157.59 1,157.59 .00 .00 765 LINDERS, DAN 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 007618 LINDSAY, CHAD 1 67.50 67.50 .00 .00 008190 LINSER, BOB 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 007299 LOVICK, DAVE 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 008193 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION CO. 1 219.40 219.40 .00 .00 002486 MATT PARROTT AND SONS COMPANY, INC. 5 859.62 859.62 .00 .00 008185 MCMILLIN, TOM 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 003882 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 1 46.50 46.50 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 698.47 698.47 .00 .00 002836 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 1 3,087.26 3,087.26 .00 .00 008021 MN METRO NORTH TOURISM 1 5,362.00 5,362.00 .00 .00 • Date: 10/29/2010 Time 08:43:26 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name Operator: KKF Page: 4 Disco # of items Net Gross Discount L. 007897 MONSON, MISSY 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 007339 MUNSON, DAVID 1 115.00 115.00 .00 .00 007893 NELSON, ERIC 1 22.50 22.50 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 646.53 646.53 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 314.52 314.52 .00 .00 000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 6 204.88 204.88 .00 .00 007730 ON SITE SANITATION INC 7 989.34 989.34 .00 .00 000094 PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. 1 6,488.50 6,488.50 .00 .00 008179 PETERSON, THOMAS /LAURA 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 008192 PIERCE, SERENA 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 008194 PIONEER PRESS 1 234.00 234.00 .00 .00 007731 PLEAA 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 314.04 314.04 .00 .00 007776 QWEST 1 52.15 52.15 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,513.25 1,513.25 .00 .00 007628 SCHLUENDER, DAN 1 95.00 95.00 .00 410 008176 SCHNEIDER, GREGORY 1 55.00 55.00 .00 007153 SCHOEBERL, KAYLENE 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 249.47 249.47 .00 .00 008177 STOKS, TRAVIS 1 27.50 27.50 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 2 125.04 125.04 .00 .00 007629 STRUEBING, MIKE 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 007642 SWEENEY, BORER, & SWEENEY, P.A. 1 614.08 614.08 .00 .00 008195 SWEENEY, MURPHY & SWEENEY, P.A. 1 10,744.27 10,744.27 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 150.42 150.42 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 39.31 39.31 .00 .00 000489 TDS METROCOM MN 1 981.78 981.78 .00 .00 Date: 10/29/2010 Time: 08:43:27 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KKF Page: 5 Discount •.lor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 007157 THORESON, STEVE 1 45.00 45.00 002465 TRI STATE PUMP AND CONTROL, INC. 1 2,331.54 2,331.54 000423 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. 1 272.37 272.37 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 440.00 440.00 900247 UPPER MIDWEST COMMUNITY POLICING INSTITU 1 750.00 750.00 008174 VANZEE, SCOTT 1 22.50 22.50 008180 VANZYL, MARIA 1 45.00 45.00 000970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 905.49 905.49 008184 VERKE, JUSTIN 1 55.00 55.00 004760 WALDOCH SPORTS, INC. 1 121.97 121.97 007245 WILLIAMS, JUSTIN 1 11.29 11.29 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 2 82.94 82.94 007505 WOOLF, TODD 1 45.00 45.00 007421 WRIGHT /HENNEPIN CO -OP ELECTRIC ASSOC 1 990.00 990.00 008196 WYCO INC dba 1 23.51 23.51 •,250 XCEL ENERGY 6 9,443.12 9,443.12 1B ZAHL PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE CO. 1 8,445.00 8,445.00 Grand Totals: 174 153,999.14 153,999.14 • .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 10/16/2010 - 10/29/2010 Oct 29, 2010 01:43PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Description 10/10 10/29/2010 4541 10600 10/10 10/29/2010 4542 11565 10/10 10/29/2010 4543 20353 10/10 10/29/2010 4544 30485 10/10 10/29/2010 4545 31008 10/10 10/29/2010 4546 31137 10/10 10/29/2010 4547 40905 10/10 10/29/2010 4548 70578 10/10 10/29/2010 4549 100100 10/10 10/29/2010 4550 160160 10/10 10/29/2010 4551 170180 10/10 10/29/2010 4552 220200 10/10 10/29/2010 4553 220250 10/10 10/29/2010 4554 230525 10/10 10/29/2010 4555 240100 Grand Totals: ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, IN ASPEN MILLS BLAINE BROTHERS, INC CENTER MART COMCAST CONNEXUS ENERGY MARTY DYCK GRAINGER JEFF'S S.O.S. DRAIN AND KATHY PEIL QWEST VERIZON WIRELESS VIKING TROPHIES JEFF WILLCOCKS XCEL ENERGY RADIO REMOVAL & INSTALL UNIFORM R21 REPAIR & MTC FUEL INTERNET STATION 1 ELECTRIC EMT REFRESHER COURSE MISC PARTS TRENCH DRAIN CLEANING TRAINING EXP FOOD ITEMS PHONE EXPENSE CELL PHONES -EQUIP CREDIT PLAQUE REPAIR SEATS 2 VEHICLES ELECTRIC STATION 2 Check Amount 435.62 74.81 569.06 139.31 94.00 293.97 235.00 1,136.56 310.00 103.44 55.78 16.01 105.49 50.00 431.37 4,050.42 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check • • AGENDA ITEM 1 D • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Divine MEETING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 10 -102 Approving MN Metro North Tourism Budget for 2011 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND Twin Cities Gateway, the new moniker of the Minnesota Metro North Tourism Bureau has established its 2011 budget. According to the by -laws, the annual budget shall be reviewed by each member city. Council will recall that at the request of the local hotels, the council approved a 3% hotel tax beginning in January 2010 which is used to fund the tourism bureau. The bureau has accomplished a great deal in 2010, including hiring its executive director, developing branding and marketing tools and establishing the new website. 2011 Budget summary: • FY2011 budget: $530,000. • Fund Balance /budget reserve: $99,000 • Operating Expenses: $120,000 • Marketing Expenditures: $372,200 The 2011 revenues will be spent for operations; regional meetings and conference marketing; a regional marketing grant program; regional marketing promotion and advertising, and community festivals grant program. Requested Council Direction 1. Approve Resolution No. 10 -102 Approving the 2011 Budget for MN Metro North Tourism. 2. Do not approve the budget. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 10 -102 2. MN Metro North Tourism proposed budget for 2011 • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -102 RESOLUTION APPROVING MN METRO NORTH TOURISM BUDGET FOR 2011 WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes approved the creation of Chapter 607 of the City Code Relating to a Tax Imposed upon Lodging on October 12, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Lodging Tax is to be used to support MN Metro North Tourism for the purpose of promoting and marketing the participating Member Cities; and WHEREAS, Article XV, Section 6 of the MN Metro North Tourism By -laws state that the annual budget of estimated income, income expense and capital expense shall be approved by the Board of Directors and submitted to a Member City's city council; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that: The Lino Lakes City Council adopts this resolution supporting the MN Metro North Tourism budget for 2011. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of November 2010. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Twin Cities Gateway CVB / • MN Metro North Tourism 10.27.10 • • FY11 SUMMARY BUDGET / OCTOBER 1, 2010 BUDGET RESERVE / Beginning of FY11 / 01.01.11 REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME SOURCES Income Expenses Reserve % of Budget Lodging Tax Receipts from 9 Cities 520,000 Explore Minnesota Tourism Marketing Grant 10,000 Revenue Total: 530,000 FY11 OPERATING EXPENDITURES Administrative & Overhead Expenses 90,000 Other Miscellaneous Expenses 20,000 City of Blaine (Fiscal Agent Services) 4,800 Organizational Insurance 1,000 Organizational Memberships 4,800 Operating Expenditures Sub - Total: 120,600 MARKETING EXPENDITURES Website Updates / Hosting / Maintenance 10,000 Regional Meetings & Conference Marketing 20,000 Community Festivals & Events Grants 38,400 Regional Marketing Grant Program 134,100 Regional Marketing / Advertising / Promotion 176,900 Marketing Expenditure Sub - Total: 379,400 FY11 Revenue Over / Under Expenditures BUDGET RESERVE / End of FY11 / 12.31.10 Anoka / Blaine / Coon Rapids / Fridley / Ham Lake / Lino Lakes / Mounds View / New Brighton / Shoreview 69,000 30,000 99,000 100% 23% 72% 5% • • • DANGEROUS ANIMAL HEARING STAFF ORIGINATOR: Chief Kent Strege HEARING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Dangerous Animal Disposition Background Case #10- 075361 • On 04/08/2010, Sgt. Kyle Leibel responded to a dog bite that occurred at Timberwolf Trail and Wolf Circle. • The victim, Carl Schmuland, stated that he had been walking near the intersection when a large, golden colored dog came at him aggressively, jumped on him and bit his left arm causing injury. • The dog was identified as being owned by the Sawh's. • Sgt. Leibel advised Sawh that due to the fact the dog had bit somebody it was now classified as a potentially dangerous dog per city ordinance and state statute. • CSO Kristen Wills followed up by mailing Raun Sawh a letter notifying him that his dog was now classified as a potentially dangerous dog and that any additional attacks would result in the dog being classified as a dangerous animal per city ordinance. • Included with the letter was a copy of the Lino Lakes city ordinance regarding dangerous and potentially dangerous animals. Case #10- 238471 • On 10/15/2010, CSO Kristen Wills responded to a dog bite report that occurred at 1366 Wolf Circle. • CSO Wills spoke with the victim, Diane Irwin, via phone who stated that the dog attacked her as she was walking through the owner's yard at 1366 Wolf Circle. • Irwin stated that as she was crossing Sawh's yard after checking on a possible fire the dog, which was attached to a long leash, came at her aggressively, jumped up and bit her once on her right elbow and again on her left hip causing injury. • Irwin stated that she had been in the yard when the first bite occurred and in the street when she received the second bite. • CSO Wills spoke with the dog's owner, Andra Sawh, who stated that she was present during the bites. • Advised Sawh that because this was the second bite incident involving her dog and because her dog had already been classified as a potentially dangerous dog that her dog would now be classified as a dangerous animal per city ordinance. • On 10/20/2010 to follow up with the owner Raun Sawh and advised him that his dog was now classified as a dangerous animal. • CSO Wills gave Sawh a letter addressed to Andra Sawh advising her that her dog was now classified as a dangerous animal and had to be permanently removed from the city within 14 days (Nov. 3). The letter also advised that Sawh may appeal the classification by November 3 at 4:30 in order to receive a hearing with the City Council. • CSO Wills issued Sawh a citation for dangerous animal. Lino Lakes City Ordinance 503.15.5a • A dangerous dog is described as one that has: o Caused bodily injury or disfigurement to any person on public or private property; o Engaged in any attack on any person under circumstances which would indicate danger to personal safety; o Exhibited unusually aggressive behavior, such as an attack on another animal; o Bitten one or more persons on two or more occasions; or o Been found to be potentially dangerous and/or the owner has personal knowledge of the same, the animal aggressively bites, attacks or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. Attachments: - Email from neighbor who witnessed the second attack - City Ordinance regarding Potentially Dangerous and Dangerous Animals City Council Options: ■ 1) Order destruction of the animal 2) Order any or all of the following (paraphrased from ordinance) a. Owner provide and maintain proper enclosure for the dangerous animal per 503.15(3)(c) b. Post clearly visible warning signs front and rear of the premises per MN statute 347.51 c. Provide and show proof annually of public liability insurance in the minimum amount of $300,000 - &,\ , A �` L d. If the dangerous dog is outside of the proper enclosure the dog must be m»zzled and restrained by a substantial leash not to exceed 6 feet in length and under the physical restraint of a person 16 years of age or older. e. The dangerous dog must have an easily identifiable, standardized tag identifying the dog as dangerous affixed to its collar at all times as specified in MN statute 347.51 f. The dangerous animal shall be registered with Anoka County within 14 days and satisfactory proof of registration provided to the Lino Lakes Police Department. g. The dangerous dog must be up to date on license and rabies 10" e —24— • • • Page 1of1 Kristen Wills From: Michael Richie [michaelrichie ©msn.comJ Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:18 PM To:. Kristen Wills Subject: Neighbors dog issue Kristen, What I am able to verify from what I saw and heard goes as follows: I was in my backyard burning some leafs and an older women who was on her cell phone came into my yard to see where the smoke was coming from and as she saw me down the elevation grade of my back yard from the road, she could see that I was there and she asked If everything is under control with the fire and smoke. I said yes everything is under control and not knowing who she was I asked who are you" she was on her cell phone and I saw her address the neighbor women and all of a sudden, a fearful scream came out from her and I could tell it was desperation. I ran up the small elevation and saw her back stepping, trying to fend off the neighbors dog (Brody) and it was a few seconds of chaos. I saw the owner get control of the dog in the middle of the street by grabbing it and pulling it back. The women attacked was obviously shaken with what just happened and the neighbor women said are you all right, and the women said yes, but she was dearly shaken from the incident. She said she was all right and although the skin was broken on her right arm, she said: I am okay and that I know what dogs can do so I am fine. She did ask the question: does the dog have it's rabies shots and the owner said yes. My knowledge of the dog named Brody is that he is a nice dog, but not a happy dog. (Opinion) He is never . walked, or maybe once to the mail box and back. He isn't outside much and for a very large dog he is confined to the basement all too long of time. The owners love him, but they work long days and the son never helps with the dog as he is home more than the parents. They are not responsible dog owners based on not giving what every dog, especially a large dog needs, and that is exercise. The inground electric dog fence didn't work as the dog charged through it as if nothing was there. so he's on a short leash when he does get out. He can't run, play or just be a dog outside and again for a large dog, and I have been an owner of several larger hunting and working dogs (Siberian Huskies and Springer Spaniels) to know they are a lot of work and commitment. This dog will attack again if given the chance. It's an unhappy or trained large dog. It needs a good home with the commitment it deserves to live a happy life. It's just too big and the commitment too large for the family to control it and having it live in the basement without proper care is a mistake. Thank you, Michael Richie Cell phone: 612 860 4482 10/28/2010 § 503.15 DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ANIMALS. (1) Attack by an animal. It shall be unlawful for any person's animal to inflict or attempt to inflict bodily injury to any person or other animal whether or not the owner is present. This section shall not apply to an attack by a dog under the control of an on -duty law enforcement officer or to an attack upon an uninvited intruder who has entered the owner's home with criminal intent. (2) Destruction of a dangerous animal. The animal control officer shall have the authority to order the destruction of dangerous animals in accordance with the terms established by this chapter. (3) Definitions. (a) A DANGEROUS ANIMAL is an animal which has: 1. Caused bodily injury or disfigurement to any person on public or private property; 2. Engaged in any attack on any person under circumstances which would indicate danger to personal safety; animal; 3. Exhibited unusually aggressive behavior, such as an attack on another 4. Bitten one or more persons on two or more occasions; or 5. Been found to be potentially dangerous and/or the owner has personal knowledge of the same, the animal aggressively bites, attacks or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. (b) A POTENTLALLY DANGEROUS ANIMAL is an animal which has: 1. Bitten a human or a domestic animal on public or private property; 2. When unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public property in an apparent attitude of attack; or 3. Has engaged in unprovoked attacks causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. (c) PROPER ENCLOSURE. Proper enclosure means securely confined indoors or in a securely locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and to provide protection for the animal from the elements. A proper enclosure does not include a porch, patio or any part of a house, garage or other structure that would allow the animal to exit of its own volition, or any house or structure in which windows are -26- • • • • • open or in which door or window screens are the only barriers which prevent the animal from exiting. The enclosure shall not allow the egress of the animal in any manner without human assistance. A pen or kennel shall meet the following minimum specifications: 1. Have a minimum overall floor size of 32 square feet; 2. Sidewalls shall have a minimum height of five feet and be constructed of 11 -gauge or heavier wire. Openings in the wire shall not exceed two inches, support posts shall be one and one - quarter inch or larger steel pipe buried in the ground 18 inches or more. When a concrete floor is not provided, the sidewalls shall be buried a minimum of 18 inches in the ground; 3. A cover over the entire pen or kennel shall be provided. The cover shall be constructed of the same gauge wire or heavier as the sidewalls and shall have no openings in the wire greater than two inches; and 4. An entrance /exit gate shall be provided and be constructed of the same material as the sidewalls and shall also have no openings in the wire greater than two inches. The gate shall be equipped with a device capable of being locked and shall be locked at all times when the animal is in the pen or kennel. (d) UNPROVOKED. Unprovoked shall mean the condition in which the animal is not purposely excited, stimulated, agitated or disturbed. (4) Designation as potentially dangerous animal. The animal control officer shall designate any animal as a potentially dangerous animal upon receiving evidence that a potentially dangerous animal has, when unprovoked, then bitten, attacked or threatened the safety of a person or a domestic animal as stated in division (3)(b) above. When an animal is declared potentially dangerous, the animal control officer shall cause one owner of the potentially dangerous animal to be notified in writing that the animal is potentially dangerous. (5) Evidence justifying designation. The animal control officer shall have the authority to designate any animal as a dangerous animal upon receiving evidence of the following: (a) The animal has, when unprovoked, bitten, attacked or threatened the safety of a person or domestic animal as stated in division (3)(a) above; or (b) The animal has been declared potentially dangerous and the animal has then bitten, attached or threatened the safety of a person or domestic animal as stated in division (3)(a) above. (6) Authority to order destruction. The animal control officer, upon finding that an animal is dangerous hereunder, is authorized to order, as part of the disposition of the case, that the animal be destroyed based on a written order containing one or more of the following findings of fact: (a) The animal is dangerous as demonstrated by a vicious attack, an unprovoked attack, an attack without warning or multiple attacks; or (b) The owner of the animal has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to control the animal in order to prevent injury to persons or other animals. (7) Procedure. The animal control officer, after having determined that an animal is dangerous, may proceed in the following manner. (a) The animal control officer shall cause one owner of the animal to be notified in writing or in person that the animal is dangerous and may order the animal seized or make orders as deemed proper. This owner shall be notified as to dates, times, places and parties bitten and shall be given 14 days to appeal this order by requesting a hearing before the City Council for a review of this determination. 1. If no appeal is filed, the orders issued will stand or the animal control officer may order the animal destroyed. 2. If an owner requests a hearing for determination as to the dangerous nature of the animal, the hearing shall be held before the City Council, which shall set a date for hearing not more than three weeks after demand for the hearing. The records of the animal control or City Clerk's office shall be admissible for consideration by the animal control officer without further foundation. After considering all evidence pertaining to the temperament of the animal, the City Council shall make an order as it deems proper. The City Council may order that the animal control officer take the animal into custody for destruction, if the animal is not currently in custody. If the animal is ordered into custody for destruction, the owner shall immediately make the animal available to the animal control officer. 3. No person shall harbor an animal after it has been found to be dangerous and ordered into custody for destruction. (8) Stopping an attack. If any police officer or animal control officer is witness to an attack by an animal upon a person or another animal, the officer may take whatever means the officer deems appropriate to bring the attack to an end and prevent further injury to the victim. (9) Notification of new address. The owner of an animal which has been identified as dangerous or potentially dangerous must notify the animal control officer in writing if the animal is to be relocated from its current address or given or sold to another person. The notification must be given in writing at least 14 days prior to the relocation or transfer of ownership. The notification must include the current owner's name and address, the relocation address and the name of the new owner, if any. _28_ • • • • (Ord. 03 -08, passed 5 -27 -2008) § 503.16 DANGEROUS ANIMAL REQUIREMENTS. (1) Requirements. If the City Council does not order the destruction of an animal that has been declared dangerous, the City Council may, as an alternative, order any or all of the following: (a) The owner provide and maintain a proper enclosure for the dangerous animal as specified in § 503.15(3)(c); (b) Post the front and the rear of the premises with clearly visible warning signs, including a warning symbol to inform children, that there is a dangerous animal on the property, as specified in M.S. § 347.51, as it may be amended from time to time; (c) Provide and show proof annually of public liability insurance in the minimum amount of $300,000; (d) If the animal is a dog and is outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash (not to exceed six feet in length) and under the physical restraint of a person 16 years of age or older. The muzzle must be of the design as to prevent the dog from biting any person or animal, but will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration; (e) If the animal is a dog, it must have an easily identifiable, standardized tag identifying the dog as dangerous affixed to its collar at all times as specified in M.S. § 347.51, as it may be amended from time to time; (f) All animals deemed dangerous by the animal control officer shall be registered with Anoka County within 14 days after the date the animal was so deemed and provide satisfactory proof thereof to the animal control officer; and (g) If the animal is a dog, the dog must be licensed and up to date on rabies vaccination. If the animal is a cat or ferret, it must be up to date with rabies vaccination. (2) Seizure. Animal control shall immediately seize any dangerous animal if the owner does not meet each of the above requirements within 14 days after the date notice is sent to the owner that the animal is dangerous. Seizure may be appealed to the district court by serving a summons and petition upon the city and filing it with the district court. (3) Reclaiming animals. A dangerous animal seized under division (2) above may be reclaimed by the owner of the animal upon payment of impounding and boarding fees, and presenting proof to animal control that each of the requirements under division (1) above is fulfilled. An animal not reclaimed under this section within 14 days may be disposed of as provided under § 503.15(6), and the owner is liable to animal control for costs incurred in confining, impounding and disposing of the animal. (4) Subsequent offenses. If an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the animal must be seized by animal control. The owner may request a hearing as defined in § 503.15(7). If the owner is found to have violated the provisions for which the animal was seized, the animal control officer shall order the animal destroyed in a proper and humane manner and the owner shall pay the costs of confining the animal. If the person is found not to have violated the provisions for which the animal was seized, the owner may reclaim the animal under the provisions of division (3) above. If the animal is not yet reclaimed by the owner within 14 days after the date the owner is notified that the animal may be reclaimed, the animal may be disposed of as provided under § 503.15(6) and the owner is liable to the animal control for the costs incurred in confining, impounding and disposing of the animal. (Ord. 03 -08, passed 5 -27 -2008) —30— • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Resolution No. 10 -99, Approving Payment Request No. 3 (Final) and Compensating Change Order No. 1, 2010 Sealcoat Project. Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: At the April 12, 2010 meeting, City Council awarded the 2010 Sealcoat Project contract to Pearson Bros., Inc. The contractor for the 2010 Sealcoat Project, Pearson Bros., Inc., is requesting City approval of Payment Request No. 3 (Final) in the amount of $6,488.50. A copy of the Final Payment is attached. The contractor has satisfactorily completed all work and has provided all necessary documentation. Also included with the request for Final Payment is Compensating Change Order No. 1 in the deduct amount of $200.00. A copy of the Compensating Change Order is attached. With this Change Order, the final project amount is $129,770.00, which is below the contract amount of $129,970.00. Approval of the Final Payment will begin the one -year warranty period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 10 -99, Approving Payment Request No. 3 (Final) and Compensating Change Order No. 1, 2010 Sealcoat Project. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -99 APPROVING PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 (FINAL) AND COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, 2010 SEALCOAT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolution of the Council adopted April 12, 2010, awarding the contract for 2010 Sealcoat Project to Pearson Bros., Inc.; WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is detailed in Payment No. 3 (Final) and Compensating Change Order No. 1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Payment Request No. 3 (Final) and Compensating Change Order No. 1 is approved for a final contract amount of $ 129,770.00. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8rd day of November, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • TKDA • • =ENGINEERING • •ARCHITECTURE PLANNING'. The right time. The right people. The right company. 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Proj. No. 14563.001 Cert. No. 3 (F) St. Paul, MN, September 30 , 2010 To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota This Certifies that Pearson Bros. Inc. For 2010 Sealcoat Owner , Contractor Is entitled to .Six Thousand Four Hundred Eighty Eight Dollars and 50 /100 Final being 2nd estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated Receiv f above Certificate. Pearson Bros Inc. , 20 / TKDA ($ 6,488.50) April 12, 2010 es E. Studenski, P.E. RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT -33— An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 129,970.00 All previous payments $ 123,281.50 All previous credits Extra No. Compensating Change Order No. 1 $ (200.00) If 11 Credit No. AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE $ 6,488.50 Totals $ 129,770.00 v $ 129,770.00 $ - Credit Balance $ - There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ - @ -� __ $ 129,770.00 $ 129,770.00 $ - -33— An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TKDA Engineering - Architecture - Planning PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. 3F (final) Period Ending September 30 , 20 10 Proj. No. 14563.001 Contractor Pearson Bros. Inc. Original Contract Amount $129,970.00 Project 2010 Sealcoat Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed Total Amount Eamed This Estimate $ 129,770.00 $ 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 129,770.00 Less Approved Credits $ 0.00 Less 0 % Retained $ 0.00 Less Previous Payments Total Deductions Amount Due This Estimate Contractor Engineer Pearson Bros. $ 123,281.50 James E. Studenski, P.E. 123,281.50 6,488.50 Date 16 - Q /v Date September 30, 2010 • • • • • • ESTIMATE NO. 3F (FINAL) 2010 SEALCOAT PROJECT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 14563.001 PERIOD ENDING: September 30, 2010 ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY +/- UNIT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE DIFFERENCE PRICE TO DATE 2010 SEALCOAT 1 BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING W/1/8" TRAP ROCK SY 110,500.00 110,500.0 - $ 1.14 $ 125,970.00 2 CRACK SEALING - (MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CITY) LBS 4,000.00 3,800.0 (200.0) $ 1.00 $ 3,800.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 3F $ 129,770.00 CHANGE ORDER TKDA Engineers - Architects- Planners Compensating Saint Paul, MN September 30 20 10 Proj. No. 14563.001 Change Order No. 1 To Pearson Bros., Inc. for 2010 Sealcoat Project for City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated April 12 , 20 10 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (decrease) (not change) the contract sum by Two Hundred Dollars and 00 /100 ($ 200.00 ). COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER This change order shows the actual quantities installed at the unit price bid amounts (see attached itemization): NET CHANGE= $ (200.00) Amount of Original Contract $ 129,970.00 Additions approved to date (Nos. ) $ Deductions approved to date (Nos. ) $ Contract amount to date $ 129, 970.00 Amount of this Change Order (M (Deduct) (Ne -Chane) $ (200.00) Revised Contract Amount $ 129,770.00 Approved City of Lino Lakes TKDA Owner By By Approved Pearson Bros., Inc. Contractor -36- s4:4 Jar4 s E. Studenski, P.E. White - Owner Pink - Contractor Blue - TKDA • • • • • • COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 PERIOD ENDING: September 30, 2010 2010 SEALCOAT PROJECT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 14563.001 ITEM • CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT NET CONTRACT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE CHANGE AMOUNT 2010 SEALCOAT 1 BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING W /1 /8" TRAP ROCK SY 110,500.00 110,500.0 $ 1.14 $ 125,970.00 $ - $ 125,970.00 2 CRACK SEALING - (MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CITY) LBS 4,000.00 3,800.0 $ 1.00 $ 3,800.00 $ (200.00) $ 4,000.00 TOTAL COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 $ 129,770.00 $ (200.00) $ 129,970.00 • • • AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson MEETING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 10 -100 Authorizing Application to the 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Mn /DNR) has established a grant program for purchasing trees. The Community Forest Bonding Grant program is intended to assist cities with creating more species diversity with the Emerald Ash Borer problem on the horizon. The grant covers 100% of the cost for purchasing trees up to $25,000. If successful trees will be planted in street boulevards and city parks where the loss of ash trees will have significant impacts. Approximately 175 trees could be planted with the grant proceeds. City staff will be responsible for planting of the trees. The grant application is due on November 19th, 2010. Staff is requesting city council authorization to apply for the grant.. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 10 -100 authorization application for the Minnesota DNR Forest Bonding Grant. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 10 -100 2. 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant Application • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -100 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2010 TO 2012 COMMUNITY FOREST BONDING GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is offering a Community Forest Bonding Grant to communities to establish a more establish a more diverse and resilient community forest; and WHEREAS, the Emerald Ash Borer established in the State of Minnesota will eventually arrive in the City of Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, the opportunity to mitigate some of the Ash mortality in Lino lakes is afforded by planting a variety of trees to replace ash trees in Lino Lakes Parks and streetscapes, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota DNR Community Forest Bonding Grant provides 100% funding for the purchase of trees, and WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes can apply for up to $25,000 to purchase and plant more diversity in several parks and two neighborhood street scapes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant Program is hereby approved and staff authorized to execute the application on behalf of the city. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council 8thh day of November, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: • Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • • Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant Application Coversheet Please refer to the Guidelines when completing the application. This form is also available on the DNR website: http: / /www.dnr. state. mn. usfgrants/ forestmgmt /commforestbondinq.html Applicant Information Organization: City of Lino lakes Date: November 2, 2010 Project coordinator: MartyAsleson Title Environmental Coordinator Address: 600 Town Center parkway City, State, Zip Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Phone: 651 -982 -2435 Email: marty.asleson @ci.lino-lanes.mn.us Fax: 651 -982 -2499 Additional Project Coordinators/Technical Advisors: (List names, organization /agency and phone) Eligibility (check one): Iv u:ity Orownship Eounty 0 Park & Recreation Board in city of First Class Has your organization received a: DNR Community Forest Bonding grant? MN Dept. of Agriculture EAB grant? No tIYes, when? 0 No Dyes, when? For cities or townships only. Is your community a Tree City USA? ONo 151 Yes Project Information Summary Statement — Please give a 2 -3 sentence summary of your overall project. The grant dollars would be used to establish a more diverse and resilient forest in City parks and Boulevards in two neighborhoods where Ash trees are planted. The city has conducted an Ash inventory of our parks and boulevards, and the trees will be planted where ash trees were either over planted or where the loss of Ash trees to EAB would effect the functional integrity of the parks and neighborhoods. A preparedness plan is currently being reviewed and includes planting new trees to establish this diversity. Location (county, city, site): Anoka, City of Leo Lakes, Country Lakes Park, Start date: ApdI,2011 Completion Date: May ,26th2010 Budget Summa Type of Fund $ Amount % of Total Non -state cash contributions (not required) % Non -state in -kind contributions (not required) % Ash Tree Removal funding requested % Tree Planting funding requested 25,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS = 25,000.00 100 % Authorization I certify this information is valid and factual as described in this application and that all costs are eligible under the DNR Community Forest Bonding Grant Guidelines. Name: Title: Signature: Date: -1_ Project Questions Please answer the following questions on separate pages. Limit to 2 pages. You may reproduce these questions on your computer. Refer to the Guidelines to see how projects will be evaluated. 1. Organization applying (e.g. City of Lino Lakes, Forest Diversity Enhancement ) and Project Title. 2. Project Purpose —In what ways will your project meet the needs of the community forest resources? Explain how the project will benefit and enhance the community and why you feel your project should receive funding. 3. Project Location Description— Describe the site location(s) of the project in detail along with special characteristics such as soil composition. 4. Document Public Ownership- If grant funds will be used along streets, provide documented proof that street rights -of -way (i.e. boulevard terrace or "street tree lawn ") are publically owned. Bond funds cannot be used on easements. Consult with your City Engineer, Attorney, Administrator, or Finance Director, or see https: / /www.revisor.leq.state.m n. us /statutes / ?id= 160.02 &vear -2008 5. Project Goals —What are the project's goals and objectives for each grant category applying for? 1. Planting for diversity. 2. Removal / replacement of EAB- infested ash trees. 6. Methods —What will be developed, produced, performed and implemented —who will be responsible for these activities and when will they occur? Include any educational outreach efforts, work with volunteers, and especially the technical plans and practices. 7. Personnel— Describe the names, titles, qualifications and project role for all staff and technical partners involved. Describe the roles of volunteers involved and training to be provided. 8. Maintenance and Management Plan A. Upon completion, what are your plans for long -term maintenance of trees planted, and monitoring and management of insect and disease pests? Include how, when and by whom activities will be accomplished. For any tree planting project, you must provide a summary of at least a 3 -year maintenance plan.* B. What is the community doing to build capacity towards long -term management of this project or a community forestry program independent of state funding? Describe any existing management plans.* *Note: Please see Required Local Program Components in the Guidelines for documents due with the Grant Project Final Report Tree Planting List Only fill out this table if you are doing tree planting as part of your project. If you need additional space, an additional sheet may be included (1 page limit). Please refer to ReLeaf native trees and shrubs list. Go to: Minnesota Releaf Trees and Large Shrubs: Species Native to Minnsota's Ecological Regions. Tree Stock Source(s): QTY Species (Common & Scientific Name) Size & Type (B &B, bareroot or containerized) Reason for selecting tree (native, windbreak, under utility line, soil conditions, etc.) 30 Hackberry 2" B&B Native and indigenous to Lino Lakes 30 Northern Pin Oak 2" B&B Native and indigenous to Lino Lakes 30 Bur Oak 2" B&B Native and indigenous to Lino Lakes 30 Basswood 2: B &B Native and Indigenous to Lino Lakes 30 Red Maple 2" B &B Native and Indigenous to Lino Lakes 25 White Oak 2" B&B Native and Indigenous to Lino Lkaes 175 Total # of Trees - 9 - • • Project Budget Breakdown Please refer to the Guidelines for eligible and ineligible expenses. Highlighted areas are ineligible. For each entry, specify type, source and amount. Feel free to include a budget narrative if necessary limit 1 page). ITEM (specify type and source) In -kind Match* Cash Match* Bonding Grant Funds Total Public Ash Tree Removal Budget (See "Know EAB- Infested Areas Map" for eli • ible • ublic lands.) 25000 Personnel:(No grant funds can be used for grantee personnel) 25000 Grantee -owned Equipment Usage (no grant funds for equipment rental or purchase): 0 Contractual Services: 0 Contractual Services 0 Grantee -owned Equipment Usage (no grant funds for equipment rental or purchase): 0 Education costs. Match only. (workshops, publications, etc) 0 Education costs. Match only. (workshops, publications, etc) Other. Please describe. (check ELIGIBILITY COSTS in Guidelines): 0 0 Other. Please describe (check ELIGIBILITY COSTS in Guidelines): 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0 Sub Totals 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 Public Tree Planting Budget (Match not required)* Personnel: :(No grant funds can be used for grantee personnel) 0 Plant Stock (trees only): 25000 25000 Grantee -owned Equipment Usage (no grant funds for equipment rental or purchase): 0 Contractual Services 0 Education costs. Match only. (workshops, publications, etc) 0 Other. Please describe. (check ELIGIBILITY COSTS in Guidelines): 0 Sub Totals 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 TOTALS Both Projects (should equal budget summary) 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 *Note: Cash or In -kind match is not required. See LEVEL OF GRANT AWARDS, p.2 in Guidelines. Application Checkoff Mail the original and 3 copies of the following: ❑ Completed and signed application form ❑ Attached pages: Answers to project questions (2 page limit), optional budget narrative (1 page limit), extra tree planting list (1 page limit), and optional map (1 page limit) Applications must be received by 4:30 pm, Friday, November 19, 2010. Mail to: 2010 -12 Community Forest Bonding Grants Minnesota DNR, Division of Forestry 500 Lafayette Road, Box 44 St. Paul, MN 55155 -4044 • • • 2010 to 2012 Community Forest Bonding Grant Application Project Questions 1. Organization applying and Project Title: City of Lino Lakes, Forest Diversity Enhancement. 2. Project Purpose: Plant Diversity has always been important in the management of Lino Lakes Resources. A 20/20 vision plan clearly identifies the Lino Lakes public response as follows: "Sustenance of the natural environment of Lino Lakes through the protection and management of the wildlife, habitats, and other natural resources, and to pass on to future residents a community rich in these resources. Future development is to include equal consideration of economic development and environmental protection." This vision statement fosters a policy of protecting remnant landscapes and integrating man -made features so that together, Lino Lakes remains a sustainable, appealing and life enriching place to live. The Community Forest Bonding Grant will help us to maintain diversity as an important element of the City's desire for sustainability.. 3. Project Location Description: The project locations are Boulevard plantings in the Highland Meadows subdivision, and Parks as follows: Lino Park, 10 trees, Behm's Park, 10 trees, Highland Park, 10 trees, City hall Park, 11 Trees, Clearwater Creek Park 21 trees, Wenzel farms Park, 3 trees, Highland Meadows Boulevard 60 trees, Quail Ridge Boulevard 23 trees For the most part, all planting soils are in well drained, fine sand soils of the Anoka County sand plain. Clearwater Creek Park is a type c or d soil that was ripped and had mulch worked into the soil after development. 4. Document Public Ownership ( See Attached). 5. Project Goals. The Goals of the Planting for Diversity is to plant alternative species to ash trees in park and boulevard areas that have an overabundance of ash trees. 6. Methods: As part of this planting the city will establish an opportunity to have public discussion concerning EAB and the City's management policys for EAB. Implementation of our AEB preparedness plan will coincide with the plantings, and public education and discussion of the issue shall occur at the board and council level concerning preparedness direction. All trees will be planted in the Spring of 2011, or Fall and spring of 2012. All trees will be planted using city crews using standard arboricultural practices. The City Environmental Coordinator shall be responsible for initiating project, discussing project and EAB preparedness at the Environmental Board and City Council. The • Environmental Coordinator shall work with city crews to implement planting of the trees. • 411 7. Personnel: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator, BS Forestry, University of Minnesota, 34 years experience planting Trees Mike Hoffman, Parks Supervisor, BS Natural Resources, University of Crookston. Miscellaneous Public works personnel, trained in arboricultural practices. All of the above will be involved in planting the trees. Marty Asleson will be involved in the evolution of our public education and EAB preparedness planning. 8. Maintenance and Management Plan: A. Long term maintenance of the trees planted are scheduled on an as per need basis or on a cycle of routine maintenance. Trees are monitored by city crews and staff. Residents have always called the city when there is a concern from observations, and the city has responded with answers and or action to correct problems. City Public works has necessary equipment to plant, establish, and maintain park and boulevard trees in good condition. City tools include, mechanized planting equipment, pruning equipment including a fully functional bucket truck, a water tanker, chemical application license and equipment to supplement nutrients using foliage ground and injection techniques. The City has had Tree City certification for 22 years. Year One: Water on a as per need basis, monitor for water deficiency, disease and insect issues. Protect trees from sun scald. Stake if needed. Work with residents on watering boulevard trees. Year Two: Water on a as per need basis, monitor for water deficiency, disease and insect issues. Unwrap trees protected for Sunscald and rewrap in the Fall. Stake if needed. Readjust any stakes still needed from year one. Year Three: Water on as per need basis, trim out any dieback from first two years and adjust tree branches for proper tree structure. Remove any stakes no longer necessary. Remove tree wrap from trees wrapped year before in the spring and re wrap if necessary. B. The City of Lino Lakes has historically budgeted enough money to purchase equipment and train personnel in tree planting, maintenance, and safety issues. The Lino Lakes Handbook for Conservation Development, Open Space and Trails Plan, and recent Resources Management Plan all address approximately 110 statements, goals and policys in our City Comprehensive Plan concerning the need to preserve, protect and restore natural resources in the City of Lino lakes. AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 8, 2010 TOPIC: Resolution No. 10 — 101, Amending Development Contract, Marshan Meadows Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City Council approved a Development Contract on March 13, 2006 to provide for a proposed development titled Marshan Meadows. Marshan Meadows provides for the construction of 20 residential units on a parcel of property near the intersection of Park Court and Lake Drive The Developer is now insolvent and the letters of credits for the project improvements are no longer available to use to complete the project. We do have available escrow dollars that are in access of the expenditures the City will require for the project. Staff has worked with Bruggeman Properties, LLC, and Citizen State Bank that has purchased the remaining empty parcels to allow the remaining escrow funds to be used in the completion of the development improvements. Citizen State Bank will cover any expenses incurred above the remaining escrow fund. The city will continue to use the escrow balance to cover expenses that incurred. Attached is a copy of the amended development agreement that staff is recommending be approved to allow for the completion of the subdivision. Bruggeman Properties LLC and Citizen State Bank has reviewed the amendment to the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Resolution Number 10 — 101 be adopted. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved • its adoption: • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 — 101 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT, MARSHAN MEADOWS WHEREAS, the City Council issued a preliminary plat approval for Marshan Meadows on May 9, 2005, and WHEREAS, the City Council approved a Development Contract on March 13, 2006, and WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory completion of public improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves Amending the Development Contract with Bruggeman Properties LLC an Citizen State Bank for Marshan Meadows and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 8th day of November, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Marshan Meadows Whereas, the City of Lino Lakes ("the City") and Bruggeman Properties, L.L.C. (`the Developer ") entered into a Development Contract on March 13, 2006, for a planned unit development known as Marshan Meadows Addition ("the Subdivision "); and Whereas, the Development Contract was recorded against the properties within the Subdivision and constitutes a covenant upon the land; and Whereas, the Developer financed construction of the Subdivision through Citizens State Bank of Hudson, Wisconsin (`the Bank "); and Whereas, pursuant to the Development Contract, the Developer put cash in escrow with the City to cover costs incurred by the City, and obtained a letter of credit from the Bank to guarantee construction of all Developer improvements; and Whereas, the Developer defaulted on its loan with Citizens, and breached the Development Contract by, inter alia, not maintaining the required letter of credit; and Whereas, the Bank foreclosed on the land in the Subdivision owned by the Developer and the redemption period has expired; and Whereas, the asphalt wear course and some punch list items must still be completed pursuant to the Development Contract; and Whereas, it is in the best interests of all parties hereto that the Subdivision be completed. Now, therefore, the City, the Developer and the Bank, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, agree as follows: 1. The items remaining to be completed under the Development Contract as of October 26, 2010, are: a. Remove fabric in catch basins to allow for inspection. b. Place shoulder materials on Lake Drive along edge of new turn lane pavement. c. Remove grass between bituminous base course and concrete curb and gutter prior to paving wear course. d. Repair damaged curb prior to paving wear course. City marked 15 locations that must be saw cut and sealed. • • e. Pave wear course. f. Repair sidewalks on the east side of Stagecoach Drive, and complete approximately 25 feet of missing sidewalk at the south end of Marshan Meadows. 2. The City will complete the items listed under Paragraph 1(a), (b) and (c) above. The Bank will complete the items listed under Paragraph 1(d), (e) and (f) above, with said items referred to herein as "the Work." 3. As of November 8, 2010, the escrow account balance is, or will be, $52,947.12. Of that amount, the City shall retain $10,188.50 for tree plantings and $5,000 for administrative costs, leaving a net escrow balance of $37,758.62. Notwithstanding the language of Paragraph V.A. of the Development Contract, the Developer and the City agree that the net escrow balance may be utilized for the payment of direct costs incurred by the Bank to complete the Work, subject to Paragraph 5(b) below. Direct costs includes only those costs invoiced by contractors performing the Work and does not include any administrative or personnel costs incurred by the Bank or the Developer ("indirect costs "). All indirect costs shall be the sole responsibility of the Bank or Developer, respectively. 4. The City's continuing right to reimburse itself for costs incurred by the City pursuant to the existing Paragraph V.A. of the Development Contract takes priority over payments out of the escrow for the Work. Because of non - Work costs, the parties hereto acknowledge that not all of the existing escrow is available to pay for the Work, and that the remaining balance may or may not cover the total cost of the Work. 5. Completion of the Work. a. The Bank shall contract with contractors as necessary to complete the Work in accordance with the Development Contract. Consistent with the Development Contract, the City retains the right to approve the contractors. b. The sidewalk repair referenced in Paragraph 1(f) shall be completed by July 1, 2011. In order to provide security for completion of the sidewalk work, $4,000 of the $37,758.62 net escrow balance is specifically reserved for that purpose and will not be released by the City until the sidewalk work is completed and approved by the City. c. The Bank shall undertake reasonable efforts to complete the street • Work referenced in Paragraphs 1(d) and (e) as soon as possible 2 • • • during the current construction season. In the event that the contractor(s) are unable to complete the Work referenced in Paragraph 1(d) and (e) in 2010, all Work must be completed by July 1, 2011. If said Work carries over into 2011, the City reserves the right to increase its escrow reserves for administrative costs. d. Invoices from the Work shall be forwarded by the Bank to the City for direct payment by the City to the contractors, as long as funds are available in the escrow account, subject to the terms of this Amendment. Payment by the City does not in any way constitute approval of the Work. City inspections and approval shall be as provided in the Development Contract. 6. Notwithstanding Paragraph V.B. of the Development Contract, no party hereto shall be required to deposit additional money into the existing escrow account in the event that the existing escrow funds are insufficient to cover City costs and the costs of the Work. In such event, the Bank shall be solely responsible for covering the excess costs of the Work, with payments of those excess costs to be made directly to the contractor(s) performing the Work. In the event that surplus funds remain in the escrow account when the escrow is closed, either in whole or in part, said surplus funds shall accrue to the Bank for reimbursement of out -of- pocket costs for undertaking the Work. 7. The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment is not an assignment of the Development Contract by the Developer to the Bank. The Developer remains solely liable for all contractual obligations under the Development Contract, including liability arising out of the work it performed and warranties related thereto, if any still apply. The Bank is undertaking the Work solely to improve the marketability of the property it obtained from Developer through foreclosure, and is not assuming any obligations or liabilities except to perform the Work as set forth in this Amendment. 8. The undersigned warrant that they have the requisite authority to execute this Amendment and bind the entity on whose behalf they sign. 3 • • Bruggeman Properties, L.L.C. Paul Bruggeman, President City of Lino Lakes Jeff Reiner, Mayor Attest: Juliann Bartell, Clerk Citizens State Bank By: Its: RRM: 146602 4