Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Mar c h 9 , 200 5 <br />Page 9 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />banners away would hurt the small businesses significantly. He felt the banners they put <br />up were professional banners and each banner cost a couple hundred dollars and he did <br />not believe they were an eyesore to the co mmunity. He noted with a 30 day limit, the <br />banners would not get torn or dirty. <br /> <br />Chair Rafferty asked if he had received anyt hing from a building official regarding an <br />existing sign ordinance. Mr. Wagner replied he had. <br /> <br />Jason Anderson, 6872 Sunrise, US Bank - 7984 La ke Drive, stated they had a unique <br />situation with their branch in that the back part of their building faced Lake Drive. He <br />stated there was a brick wall that he had in stalled hooks on where th ey advertised their <br />special promotions. He noted they had trie d newspaper advertising and they received <br />very little response to that and the only advertising that worked was their temporary <br />signage and banners on their building. He stated he had put one of those signs out and he <br />had received a letter indica ting they had to purchase a pe rmit for the sign and when he <br />went in to get the permit, he was informed he could not get one because he was not <br />having a special event and the permits were fo r special events only and he was asked to <br />remove the sign. He stated he tried to be in compliance but was told he could not get a <br />permit and this was frustrating for him. He asked the Board to take his concerns into <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Bill Mayhe, 6810 Lake Drive, Trappers Grill, stated they previously had banners up <br />which they took down when they received a le tter from the City. He noted when they <br />took down their banners, he noticed a decrease in phone calls regardi ng his specials. He <br />indicated they also had a marquee, but it wa s important that they were allowed to use <br />banners in addition to the marquee. <br /> <br />Katie Allen, 3890 88 th Court NE, stated she opened up a new business in Spirit Hills Mall <br />8 months ago. She indicated she worked 13 hours a day and did not draw a salary. She <br />noted temporary signage was very important for a small business. She indicated when <br />she had banners up, her business increased, bu t when she did not have the signs up, her <br />business paid the price for it and she could not af ford this. She stated she would be out of <br />business soon if she was not allowed to put up temporary signage. She noted signage <br />was important to keep the business in the eyes of the citizens. She stated her business <br />was Allure Salon. She noted th e temporary signs made a huge difference to her business. <br />She stated she had not received any letters from the City with respect to her signage. She <br />noted Spirit Hills was a new mall and they ha d the same problem with being backward <br />onto Birch Street. She stated they had no wa y to let people know who was in that mall <br />without being able to be allowed temporary signage. She indicated she had previously <br />put out signage, but the signs disappeared. She was not sure who took the signs. She <br />stated if all of the big busi nesses, builders, and realtors were allowed to have signs up, <br />but the small businesses were not, she was not in favor of this. She asked why the City <br />was not supporting the smaller business owne r. She noted one sign permit for $25.00 for <br />17 days was not sufficient. She indicated when a new business came into a community, <br />people did not know the business was there without signage. She indicated a small <br />business could not survive in Lino Lakes wit hout signage. She asked the Board to help <br />the small business owner. Chair Rafferty not ed these ordinances would be coming up <br />also.