Laserfiche WebLink
Pl anni ng & Zo ni n g B o ar d <br />Ju ne 9 , 20 04 <br />Page 7 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />1. Issuance of the sequencing permit by the RCWD, based on Application No. <br />03-090. <br /> <br />2. That relocating the wetl and will not adversely aff ect neighboring properties. <br /> <br />3. That location of propos ed driveways be shown. <br /> <br />4. That appropriate park fees are provided. <br /> <br />5. That the City Engineer’s r ecommendations be included in these <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps questioned if the Rice Creek Wa tershed would be approving this and asked <br />if they were approving this t oo soon. He noted this was a big leap to assume this was <br />going to be approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if this would not be pr esented until 2005. Mr. Smyser replied that <br />was correct. <br /> <br />Mr. Root stated there were a lot of conditions and he believed it put a lot of burdens on <br />the staff to make sure the contingencies we re complied with and he believed this was <br />something they should be dealing with. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if the original request wa s denied as presented. Mr. Thompson replied <br />that was correct. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated it was his understanding a pplicant was now proceeding with the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District’s suggestions. Mr . Thompson replied he believed that was <br />accurate. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if this was a good time fo r the applicant to get a stub now to the <br />utilities. Mr. Thompson repl ied with the road repair taking place now, this was an <br />appropriate time to obtain a stub. <br /> <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he did not wa nt to miss the applicant’s to have the opportunity to put in <br />a stub at this time and end up tearing up a newl y constructed road in the next couple of <br />year. <br /> <br />Tim Macki, applicant’s engineer and surveyor, stated they ne ver got denied from the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District initially. He st ated they were in discussion with Carl <br />Hammers, which pushed their plans back, a nd this was tabled by the District pending <br />receipt by the various information they required. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps asked where would they be a month from now with respect to Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. Mr. Macki replied he anticipated they woul d have their permit. <br />