Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 12, 2003 APPROVED MINUTES <br />Page 12 <br />Appropriately, an opportunity for future subdi vision of the northerl y extension has been <br />provided via access to Stallion Road. Considering home placement and wetland <br />infringements, street access to the southe rly exception is not c onsidered practical. <br />Wetlands. Three designated wetlands ar e located within the centr al area of the property <br />and comprise a significant portion of the si te. Such wetlands are considered a site <br />amenity and obviously influence the configura tion of the development. As required by <br />ordinance, a wetland mitigation plan has been submitted for review. <br />The proposed development is subject to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) <br />approval. To date, comments from the Distri ct regarding the acceptability of the project <br />have not been received. The applicant is however, in the process of coordinating the <br />project with the Watershed District. To date however, the City has no information <br />regarding the Watershed District review. <br />To be noted is that the upland area of the s ite cannot be substantiated until such time as <br />the wetland areas have been veri fied by the Watershed District. <br />As a condition of PDO approval, all conditi ons imposed by the Watershed District must <br />be satisfied. <br />Greenways. The concept plan illustrates a series of interconnecting eight foot wide <br />bituminous trails. While the inclusion of the trails in considered positive, it would seem <br />appropriate to extend the east/west trail se gment beneath the power easement to the west <br />to connect to Sunset Road. The acceptabil ity of the trailways in fulfilling the greenway <br />directive of the Comprehensive Plan should be subject to comment and recommendation <br />by the Park Board. <br />Park Dedication. As shown on the Parks/Open Space Plan, a significant portion of the <br />subject property is to be dedicated as public park land. Specifi cally, the concept plan <br />provides 22.5 acres of gross public park la nd, 7.3 acres of which is contiguous upland. <br />To be noted is that the upland acres of pa rkland cannot be substan tiated until such time as <br />the wetland areas have been verified by the Watershed District. <br />The integration of such park areas responds to a specific directive of the Comprehensive <br />Plan of providing a greenway in the area. While the inclusion of such park land is <br />considered positive, an assurance should be made that problems do not result from the <br />combination of private and public park owne rship. Of specific concern is that the <br />primary east/west trailway through the property be available to all park users (regardless <br />of private and public ownership). <br />Tree Preservation. According to the app licant, a significant amount of existing tree <br />massings in the southern portion of the site are to be preserved. While the existing <br />conditions map identifies generalized tree massi ngs, a specific tree inventory has not, to <br />date, been submitted. <br />The Subdivision Ordinance do es not specifically mandate the submission of a tree <br />inventory, nor has the Environmental Board requested such a submission.