Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 12, 2003 APPROVED MINUTES <br />Page 15 <br />Mr. Lyden asked if the road did not go thr ough, how long did it take to the neighborhood. <br />Chief Bennett replied it took 3-4 minutes. <br />Mr. Lyden asked how many residents were wi thin 5 minutes of the fire department. <br />Chief Bennett stated the average response time from time of call to time of delivery was <br />7.03 on average. <br />Mr. Lyden asked what was the acceptable res ponse times. Chief Bennett replied that was <br />a matter of opinion. He noted the ambulance ro ute had the same rout e as the fire route <br />had. <br />Mr. Lyden noted without the Ca rl Street connection, they w ould still be below average. <br />Chief Bennett replied he was not taking into account the response time, so he believed it <br />was about average without the connection. <br />Chair Schaps asked about having only emerge ncy accesses. Chief Bennett noted he was <br />opposed to that idea because th ey were not plowed in the winter and to stop to remove <br />the barrier cost them in response time. He noted if the road was plowed, even though it <br />would be only for emergencies, the road would be used by the general public. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if they would have more corners to take if they put Carl Street <br />through. Chief Bennett noted an additiona l corner would not be an issue. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if he had a house at the e nd of Carl Street and it was currently a cul- <br />de-sac, what would you think if a new deve lopment went behind you in and your cul-de- <br />sac went through. Chief Bennett replie d he could not speak on that issue. <br />Police Chief Peecha stated their position was a little different than the Fire Department. <br />He stated he had prepared a study on Grid 7 and stated for the emergency calls in that <br />area it took 2-5 minutes to respond to a medi cal emergency. Anything over five minutes, <br />the Fire Department was usually there. He noted with the new development, he expected <br />their response times to be similar. He noted there were several a dditional accesses off of <br />Lilac and Sunset to get into that area. He st ated it may or not be beneficial to have access <br />off of Carl Street depending on where the officer was located. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the police had any opin ion about the access off of Carl Street. Mr. <br />Peecha replied as long as they had sufficien t access off of Sunset and Lilac, it did not <br />impact them that much. <br />Chair Schaps invited appl icant to make comment. <br />John Johnson, engineer, stated they were in agreement with the c onditions in the staff <br />report. He noted they still needed to disc uss phasing in detail. He stated they had <br />submitted two phasing plan. Option one would not include townhomes in the first phase <br />and would not include a connection to Carl St reet. At the completion of pahses one and <br />two there would be 120 units. Option two woul d have 79 units in the first phase, which <br />would include the townhomes and the Carl Street Connection. He noted this option <br />would have 122 units. He stated they were optimistic they could begin construction in