Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 13, 2003 <br />Page 11 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />back would the building sit from the propert y line. Mr. Grochala replied what was <br />proposed was a right turn lane, which woul d taper down. He stated they were not <br />proposing closing any driveways to the site. He indicated there would be shoulder work <br />done in that area. He noted what happened down the line with Lake Drive with the <br />County however, was out of their control. <br />Ms. Weinkauf expressed concern that both of her accesses would be in a turn lane. Mr. <br />Grochala stated they would attempt to avoid any impacts to her accesses. <br />Carl Buchholz, 7417 Lake Drive, asked wher e would the docks be in relation to his <br />house. He expressed concer n about construction occurri ng 24 hours a day. Mr. Grochala <br />pointed out where the docks would be in relation to his property. <br />Mr. Pat Lind, Palico Instruments, Lake Drive, asked what were the plans to get City <br />water and sewer to him. Mr. Grochala replie d they were getting it up to that point and as <br />development took place it would be exte nded. He noted the City was committed to <br />getting a waterman through this area with san itary sewer as needed. He indicated it was <br />heading that way. <br />Mrs. Pat Lind, Palico Instruments, Lake Drive, stated she was objecting to the size of the <br />building as well as the increase of traffic, es pecially truck traffic. She noted if was <br />difficult to see at the intersection of 35W and Lake Drive. She stated this area needed <br />traffic control and this was the important issue at the moment. She requested this <br />development not be put in until the traffic issue was addressed. <br />Donna Carlson, 6808 East Shadow Lake Drive, stated vision 20/20 indicated this was the <br />main gateway to the City and the proposed land use and comprehensive plan said this <br />area was commercial. She noted the City had just established this area as a TIF district. <br />She stated her main point is traffic and the County’s refusal to reconstruct the Lake Drive <br />bridge. She stated with the addition of futu re housing, as well as commercial traffic, it <br />did not make sense to add additional truck tra ffic to Lake Drive. Mr. Grochala pointed <br />out this area was currentl y zoned light industrial and the proposed land use was light <br />industrial, and with respect to TIF, the City took action to establish a TIF district. He <br />noted no commitments have been made to the developer for TIF. He stated staff had <br />looked at this option for traffi c improvement in this area. He stated Anoka County had <br />dropped the Lake Drive bridge project becau se of funding limitations and the City not <br />approving the Hodgson Lake corridor. He stat ed it was his main concern to get this <br />bridge reconstructed as soon as possible. <br />Mr. Lyden stated he believed this area should not be a TIF district. <br />Ms. Weinkauf asked if the State could contri bute to the bridge. Mr. Grochala replied <br />with the State turn back to the County, it did include some limited dollars for the bridge <br />project, but the County had utili zed those dollars elsewhere. <br />Jim Wyatt, 1705 85 th Avenue, Blaine, stated he ow ned a business at 7337 Lake Drive. <br />He asked if he could waive out of connecting to sewer and water at this time. He stated