06/12/2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Though the increase in peak trip generation from a drive through facility will not exceed road capacities, a drive through increases peak traffic through a residential neighborhood. This is detrimental to the neighborhood. 8. The drive through facility is a fundamental element of the proposed site design. and the relationship of other elements changes significantly without it. Without the second driveway, the submitted plan would not provide sufficient parking as the `proof of parking' area would have no access. Therefore, the outdoor seating cannot be approved with the submitted plan. 9. These findings are based on the following: Preliminary Utility Plan, 2/17/06, received April 3, 2006 Preliminary Grading Plan, 2/12/06, received Feb 17, 2006 Photometric Plan, received Apr 3, 2006 Site Plan, revised 3/28/06, received Apr 3, 2006 Site Details, revised 3/28/06, received Apr 3, 2006 Landscape Plan, revised 3/28/06, received Apr 3, 2006 Floor Plan, revised 3/28/06, received Apr 3, 2006 Exterior Elevations, revised 3 /28/06, received Apr 3, 2006 Sign Plan, received Apr 3, 2006 Certificate of Survey, 2/16/06, received Feb 16, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the findings, the City Council denies the application for a conditional use permit for the accessory drive through facility and for the outdoor dining facilities shown on the submitted plans. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2006. ATTEST: John J. Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: • Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. - 36 - Resolution 06 -53, page 3