My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/12/2006 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2006
>
06/12/2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2014 1:42:53 PM
Creation date
4/22/2014 9:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/2006
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />3. The Commercial section of the Land Use Plan chapter of the Comprehensive Plan <br />states that several "strategies will be implemented to promote quality commercial <br />areas" (page 88) , one of which is: "Site access will be controlled to provide safe <br />traffic movement and to reduce the commercial traffic impacts on residential <br />neighborhoods." <br />An existing driveway creates an offset north of the intersection of Ojibway Path and <br />Lakota Trail. Creating the second commercial site driveway that is offset on the <br />south of the same street intersection creates additional traffic movement conflicts, <br />which creates safety concerns. Therefore the project is inconsistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />4. In the Land Use section of the Policy Plan chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, there <br />is a list of goals and policies for commercial development. Policy number 17 (page <br />34) is: <br />In evaluating commercial sites, factors will be the physical implication of the <br />commercial land use related to traffic generation, sewer and water demands, <br />environmental issues and compatibility with neighboring land uses. <br />Increasing the early morning traffic raises concerns about the compatibility of a drive <br />through facility with the neighboring residential land uses. Therefore the project is <br />inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />5. Section 2, Subdivision 2.B.7.b. of the zoning ordinance requires that "The proposed <br />development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area." <br />The site is guided for commercial use and a commercial building was reviewed for <br />the site as part of the original Millers Crossroads project. However, a drive through <br />increases peak traffic through a residential neighborhood and the proposed driveway <br />location raises safety concerns due to its offset from a street intersection and the near <br />proximity of another offset driveway. <br />6. Section 2, Subdivision 2.B.7.d. of the zoning ordinance requires that "Traffic <br />generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the <br />City." Even though the increase in peak trip generation from a drive through facility <br />will not exceed road capacities, a drive through increases peak traffic through a <br />residential neighborhood. <br />7. Section 2, Subdivision 2.B.7.h. of the zoning ordinance requires that the project "Will <br />not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of <br />operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare <br />because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors." <br />- 3 5 - <br />Resolution 06 -53, page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.