Laserfiche WebLink
13. The landscaping plan does not provide an eighty (80) percent opacity to a minimum <br />height of six (6) feet on the east, south, and west side of the site. <br />14. Review of this application is based on the following: <br />Utility Plan, revised 8 -2 -06 and received August 3, 2006 <br />Grading and Erosion Plan, revised 8 -2 -06 and received August 3, 2006 <br />Site Plan — Drive Up Option revised 8 -1 -06 and received August 3, 2006 <br />Landscape Plan, revised 8 -1 -06 and received August 3, 2006 <br />Site Details, revised and received July 21, 2006 <br />Floor Plan, revised and received July 21, 2006 <br />Exterior Elevations, revised and received July 21, 2006 <br />Photometric Plan, received Apr 3, 2006 <br />Sign Plan, received Apr 3, 2006 <br />Certificate of Survey, 2/16/06, received Feb 16, 2006 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the findings, the City <br />Council denies the application for a conditional use permit for the accessory drive <br />through facility and for the outdoor dining facilities shown on the submitted plans. <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006. <br />John J. Bergeson, Mayor <br />ATTEST: <br />Julianne Bartell, City Clerk <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following <br />voted in favor thereof: <br />The following voted against same: <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Resolution 06 -136. page 3 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />