11/13/2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • 2 so that the existing dwelling can remain on Lot 1. This is a reduction of 3% and 5% respectively; therefore staff sees this as an acceptable minor deviation of the code requirements. Setbacks: The applicant is proposing to deviate from the 10 foot side setback required for principal buildings in the R -1 zone. Considering the location of the existing dwelling; strict application of the 10 foot setback would limit Lot 2 to a width of 73.5 feet and an area of 9,702 square feet. Therefore the applicant is proposing a 6.27 foot side setback, which is slightly greater than the five feet that is required for accessory structure and will therefore maintain a minimum of ten feet separation between the existing dwelling and the home constructed on Lot 2. Considering this structure will exist when Lot 2 is developed, this reduction in setback will not have a negative effect on the surrounding properties. Streets: Arlo Lane, Lois Lane and Country Lane all are existing roads. No additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the new homes. As part of the final plat, the developer must dedicate the Arlo Lane right of way. This will fulfill the intent of the City when Mar Don Acres was platted. Arlo Lane exists now, and the dedication is more of a formality. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication in the amount of $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Highland Meadows Park is nearby. The park dedication will be $2,075 x 3 new home lots = $6,225. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water is already in place in Arlo Lane and is being installed in Lois Lane presently. All of the proposed lots, including the existing home, must connect to utilities. Onsite septic systems must be abandoned according to law. In addition, existing wells likely will have to be capped because of proximity to new sanitary sewer lines. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. Grading: The grading plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board's comments requesting an infiltration area in the form of a rain garden have been addressed on the revised grading plan. The request for tree inventory /preservation plan will be required prior to any construction on the site.