My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/22/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
09/22/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 12:20:53 PM
Creation date
5/14/2014 11:24:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/22/2008
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />T-i-e,sw 11 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />: August 18, 2008 <br />. 7:50 p.m. <br />. 8:40 p.m. <br />: Council members Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />Reinert, Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson <br />: None <br />Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Finance Director, Al Rolek; <br />Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; Director of Public Safety, Dave <br />Pecchia; Director of Public Services, City Clerk, Julie Bartell <br />Citizens' Petition for Charter Amendment - City Clerk Bartell reported that the city <br />received a petition from the Lino Lakes Citizens for Safer Roads requesting that the cit <br />charter be amended regarding procedures for special assessments. A letter was also <br />distributed that had been received from members of the former Citizens Task Force to <br />Review Public Improvements supporting the amendment proposed by the petition. <br />Ms. Bartell explained the process used to review the petition for legal form and validity <br />and number of signatures. That process is underway and staff will report on the <br />sufficiency of the petition within the statutory time line (by August 22, 2008). Official <br />action of the council is not requested at this meeting. If the petition is found to be <br />sufficient, it would be placed on the ballot this fall with the council having the <br />responsibility of setting the ballot language. The council initiated charter amendment by <br />ordinance is still on the table. <br />The mayor noted that the council will be faced with the question of what they will send to <br />the ballot. If this petition is found sufficient, it must be forwarded but the council can <br />also decide to forward on the amendment initiated by the citizens' task force. <br />It was recommended by a council member that the entire story be included in the <br />communication plan that is presented to the public. Another council member questioned <br />the viability of discussing in the communication plan an amendment that isn't on the <br />ballot (possibly the council/citizen task force ordinance). <br />The council discussed the difference between the petitioned amendment and the <br />council/citizen task force ordinance amendment. The major difference is that the citizen <br />task force /council ordinance amendment includes an allowance for the affected property <br />owners to stop a project. Under Chapter 429 (the petitioned amendment), the decision <br />basically rests with the council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.