My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1989
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:31:23 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:12:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 20 <br />The State of Minnesota is apparently developing a unique view of what constitutes prudent <br />fiscal management for Minnesota cities. Currently, the Minnesota Department of Revenue is <br />exploring options for reducing LGA and HACA for 1990 and future years as a method of reducing <br />the State's budget shortfall. One method that is under consideration for cutting aids is based upon <br />city reserve balances. Presumably, cities with "large" reserve balances would experience "large" <br />aid cuts. <br />We recommend that the City strongly oppose this method of targeting aid reductions to cities <br />for the following reasons: <br />1. The proposed targeting would penalize those cities which do practice sound fiscal <br />management. <br />2. The proposed targeting would encourage less responsible fiscal management. This would <br />result in financial crisis for individual cities and ultimately affect the bond ratings of all <br />Minnesota cities including the City of Lino Lakes. <br />3. The targeting program would be virtually impossible to administer on a fair and equitable <br />basis because financial management practices and fund structures are not consistent or <br />easily comparable among cities. What may appear to be a low reserve balance of a city's <br />General Fund may be an adequate reserve balance for such city. Examples are as follows: <br />• Transferring monies from the General Fund to other funds for capital acquisitions or <br />anticipated acquisitions. <br />• The use of Special Revenue funds to account for basic services such as police, fire and <br />other. <br />• The use of Internal Service funds for compensated absences and other purposes. <br />• The reservation of General Fund Balance for cash flow, compensated absences, etc. <br />• Transferring of reserved balance amounts to other city funds. <br />4. Many cities have established reserve policies and made significant fiscal management <br />decisions based on the established/targeted reserve policy. The effectiveness of such <br />planning and fiscal management would be severely hampered (if not destroyed) by reserve <br />balance "raiding" by the State. <br />5. The State is possibly seeking to pass its financial crisis on to local government. This <br />would be a temporary solution to apparently poor fiscal management at the State level. <br />6. The potentially lost reserve balance could diminish the city's bond rating and potentially <br />deplete a city's reserve balance pledged to secure debt service requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.