My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1984
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:25:37 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:19:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Management Report, Page 41 <br />Computer System <br />The City has been considering the purchase of a computer system for the past several <br />years. The need for automation is apparent in various phases of City operations. The <br />City has limited funds for this endeavor. Additionally, there is limited availability <br />of quality software for microcomputer systems for cities. <br />We recommend that the City carefully consider the available options prior to <br />purchasing a system. Additionally, internal controls and operating systems must be <br />thoroughly reviewed prior to the implementation. <br />The conversion from a service bureau to an in -house system requires revamping of <br />internal control procedures. A partial listing of areas to review is as follows: <br />• Input Controls. Including input authorization, changes to input data, <br />input error detection controls, etc. <br />• Process Controls. Including validation of data prior to processing, <br />error detection features of systems, periodic tests of system functions, <br />etc. <br />• Output Controls. Including test of output for accuracy, distribution of <br />output controls, retention of output system, etc. <br />• Program Controls. System to assure that existing programs are not <br />altered without authorization and that authorized program changes are <br />effected and that all programs (and changes thereto) are properly docu- <br />mented completely and accurately. <br />• System Security. To assure only authorized use of the system and to <br />safeguard data that would otherwise be lost through error (or disaster <br />such as fire). <br />• Development of user manuals. <br />• Scheduling of system's user priority. <br />• Segregation of duties. <br />The above areas should be addressed by the City to assure a successful implemen- <br />tation of the overall system. These features will better assure safeguarding of City <br />interests and the overall integrity of the system. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.