My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:22:50 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 18 <br />payments designed to correlate with assessment collections. The debt payments are fixed <br />and will not change. If the City does not collect assessments on a timely basis, cash <br />shortages in these funds may occur. We recommend that the City carefully monitor the <br />delinquent collection rate and provide supplemental financing if assessment collections <br />are not adequate to meet bonded debt payments. <br />Deferred assessments receivable represent the balance of assessment rolls which will <br />be spread for collection in 1983 through 1990. <br />The amount of tax forfeit assessments receivable was $132,981 at December 31, 1982. <br />These assessments are not currently being spread for collection. Most of these <br />assessments relate to the Improvement Bonds of 1982. Should the City not collect these <br />assessments, the financial position of the 1982 Improvement Bond Fund would be impaired. <br />The bond resolution issuing permanent financing for this issue anticipated reduced reve- <br />nue flows because of the tax forfeit situation. Deferred property tax levies were sche- <br />duled in that resolution to offset the potential effects of tax forfeited assessments. <br />We recommend that the City determine the status of this tax forfeiture and, if deemed <br />necessary, initiate a review of the financing of the 1982 Improvement Bond Fund (see <br />later comments) . <br />The amount presented as "City Property" totaled $11,569 at December 31, 1982. The <br />assessments on this parcel relate to a property which was acquired by the City in 1981. <br />The City has the option of "paying" these assessments to the appropriate debt service <br />fund from other City funds or it may cancel these assessments. When property is <br />acquired with assessments receivable outstanding, the City should take action to pay or <br />abate the assessments thereon. The decision to abate assessments should be made after <br />reviewing the projected financial position of the related debt service fund. If the <br />non - collection of these assessments has a material adverse effect on that fund's ability <br />to make debt payments, then the City should take action to provide replacement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.