My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:22:50 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 19 <br />financing. We recommend that the City adopt a policy with regard to assessments on <br />City owned land and that such policy be formally recorded in the actions of the City <br />Council. <br />There are two parcels on an assessment roll which appear on City records as being <br />collectible in 1982 and 1983. The County, however, has not spread the amounts related <br />to these two parcels for either 1982 or 1983. We recommend that the City research the <br />cause of this situation and take corrective action. <br />The City effects special assessment collections through Anoka County as a collection <br />agent. This agency arrangement has advantages to the City primarily in saving admi- <br />nistrative time and effort required to bill and collect special assessments. A certain <br />level of control, however, is lost through the agency arrangement insofar as accounting <br />records are located and maintained at both the County and the City. Correlation of <br />these records is required to assure accurate tabulation of receivables and amounts <br />recieved. During the course of our audit, we noted discrepencies in City and County <br />assessment records. One discrepency as discussed above, related to the parcels which <br />the County is not spreading for collection (but for which City records indicate there <br />should be a levy). Other discrepancies relate to receivable balances for deferred, <br />delinquent and tax forefeit assessments. In order to assure that the City's best <br />interests are guarded, the City should improve internal records with regard to special <br />assessments and compare such records periodically to County records. The following <br />improvements should be considered: <br />1. Maintenance of delinquent assessment records by parcel and fund. This <br />listing can be updated for receipts and adjustments at they occur. Each <br />year this listing should be compared to County records. Any differences <br />should be reconciled and appropriate adjustments made. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.