Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 25 <br />finance expenditures which are paid evenly throughout the year. However, the City <br />does <br />not receive these monies until July and December of each year. Therefore, a cash flow <br />surplus equal to one -half of this levy is required to meet the daily cash flow needs of <br />the City prior to the receipt of these general property taxes. Without this level of <br />surplus, the City will be in a cash overdraft position (for its General Fund) prior to <br />the receipt of its first tax settlement in July of each year. <br />For 1982 and future years, the State has changed the timing of local government aid <br />payments to all Minnesota cities. Such a change resulted in the City not receiving any <br />local government aid until July of each year instead of equal payments four times each <br />year. The "minimum required reserve" has therefore increased by one -half of such aid. <br />A second reason for maintaining operating reserves is to provide a source of <br />emergency and /or unanticipated expenditures (i.e. extraordinary storm damage, diseased <br />trees, inflation, etc.). Operating budgets are estimates only. Inflationary factors <br />effecting both routine procedures and emergency type costs can adversely effect the <br />budget process. A city requires a reserve to finance these events. One method of <br />measuring the amount of this type of reserve is to use a percent of the City's annual <br />operating budget (i.e. 5% to 10% or more, depending upon the overall budget philosophy <br />of the City). <br />1 <br />A third reason for maintaining an operating reserve is to provide for future changes <br />in the level of shared taxes (i.e. aids) by the State and Federal governments. At the <br />present time, the State is involved in a budget crisis and the Federal government is <br />involved in a tax reduction program. Although the outcome of these situations are yet <br />to be defined, it appears certain that past trends of increasing aids to ci ties by both <br />the State and Federal governments will not continue. It appears likely that this trend <br />will be reversed with a larger portion of the cost of City government being financed by <br />revenue raised locally rather than at the State or Federal levels. Local government <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />