My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
Management Report and Recommendations 12/31/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2014 11:22:50 AM
Creation date
5/19/2014 11:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Document Folder
Annual Financial Reports
Finance Number Identifier
Management Report and Recommendations
Date
12/31/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Management Report, Page 40 <br />Billings from MWCC <br />Estimated <br />Final <br />Percent Percent <br />Year Amount Change Amount Change <br />1977 $ 3,046 $ 1,573 <br />1978 3,560 16.8% 3,662 132.8% <br />1979 8,312 133.5 6,171 68.5 <br />1980 6,858 (17.5) 7,123 15.4 <br />1981 11,357 65.6 10,213 43.4 <br />1982 15,504 36.5 Not available <br />1983 19,027 22.7 Not available <br />There are two basic factors which contribute to increased billings from the MWCC. <br />The first is increased use of the system. The estimated increased usage for 1983 over <br />1982 for the City of Lino Lakes is 8.7 %. The second factor which increases the billings <br />from MWCC is their increased cost to process gallonage. Their cost to process (per <br />million gallons) increased from an estimate $674 to an estimated $761. This respresents <br />an increase of 12.9 %. The combination of these factors increased the City's estimated <br />cost in 1983 by nearly 23 %. As the system gains users, the increased usage part of the <br />overall increase should be offset by the billings to new users. The per unit portion of <br />th increase, however, must be borne in full by existing users or be subsidized by <br />overall City operations. <br />II The City has no control over the billings from the MWCC for the sewer treatment <br />costs. This operating expense comprises 62% of the 1982 billings for sewer service <br />charges. The City must set rates at levels adequate to pay for the pass through costs <br />from MWCC. In view of this arrangement with MWCC, the City's ability to exercise <br />control over its sewer operations is limited. The City can be construed to be acting as <br />an agent for the MWCC with regard to sanitary sewer operations. <br />The City has had a Water and Sewer Utility Rate Analysis (dated March 31, 1982). <br />That analysis included proposed increases in utility rates as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.