My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/22/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
06/22/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2014 3:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/22/2014 12:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/22/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT <br />STRENGTHS <br />➢ Bond Rating AAA & AA1 Improved couple <br />of times <br />➢ We have a budgeting process <br />➢ We have worked on the budget <br />➢ We have a 5 -Year Plan <br />➢ We have issues ahead of us. We have <br />data for planning <br />➢ Reserved...we have a good finance <br />manager <br />➢ We've beefed up funds over the years <br />➢ Audit findings -no surprises <br />➢ We aren't overspending budget <br />WEAKNESSES <br />➢ Staff needs more direction on budget <br />issues <br />➢ We need more info from staff <br />➢ 5 ye▪ ar plan -no flexibility <br />➢ Town Center is in trouble- bank - foreclosed <br />➢ We spend as much as is coming in...Iess <br />coming in -have to decrease spending <br />4. ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY <br />STRENGTHS <br />➢ There are excellent staff at the Director <br />Level <br />➢ Staff - most are effective. Some are not <br />engaged with the job <br />➢ Council has quality training opportunities - <br />training /networking issues <br />➢ We are going to hire a new administrator <br />➢ We have reviewed the Job Description - it's <br />in good shape <br />➢ We are at 55-60% pay structure - should we <br />be higher or lower <br />➢ Personnel policy issues <br />WEAKNESSES <br />Communication between Council and Staff <br />Some staff ineffective <br />Process for developing best and brightest <br />No process to rid ineffective staff <br />May not have opportunity for quality training <br />Auditorium settings -get better info <br />Issues - interactions <br />City projects impossible: for example road <br />reconstruction is voted on by the people <br />and no one wants to pay for someone <br />else's road <br />➢ Always referendums to vote for - negative on <br />referendums <br />➢ We can't put amount on but need specific <br />projects <br />➢ Efficient -not get it done/inefficient get it <br />done <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.