Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AGENDA ITEM 6B <br />Michael Grochala <br />July 27, 2009 <br />TOPIC: Public Hearing, I- 35E/CSAH 14 Improvement <br />Project <br />ACTION REQUIRED: Simple Majority to Open and Close Public <br />Hearing <br />BACKGROUND <br />The City Council accepted the Feasibility Study, prepared by SRF Consulting Group, <br />Inc., for the I- 35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) Interchange Improvements on July 6, 2009. <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the City Charter, the City must <br />hold a hearing on improvements prior to ordering the project. The purpose of the public <br />hearing is to solicit public comment on the proposed improvement from interested <br />persons whether or not they are in the proposed assessment area. In accordance with <br />City Charter provisions 60 days must elapse from the date of the public hearing before <br />the City Council can take any further action. <br />The interchange has experienced significant congestion problems for the past several <br />years, specifically at the freeway ramps during a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The <br />proposed project includes the reconstruction of the interchange between 21st Avenue <br />and Otter Lake Road by bridge replacement and widening, roadway replacement and <br />widening, reconstruction of existing freeway ramps and construction of new ramps, <br />installation of traffic control signals, improvement to local road connections and <br />construction of pedestrian/bicycle facilities. <br />The estimated cost of the improvement is approximately $23 million including land <br />acquisition, engineering, and construction. Approximately $5.5 million is proposed to <br />be assessed to benefiting property owners. The City has held two meetings with <br />affected property owners over the last month to discuss the project. <br />Staff is currently working with Springsted Inc., the City's financial consultant, and Anoka <br />County to evaluate additional funding sources for the project. The results of this <br />exercise may lower the total amount to be assessed against benefiting properties. Any <br />reduction in the proposed assessment amounts will be calculated and incorporated into <br />the final assessment role and presented at a second public hearing referred to as the <br />the "Assessment Hearing" following published and mailed notice. <br />