Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 10, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />46 to the $500,000 amount would not adversely affect the city's credit rating; however, <br />47 formal approval of a fund balance policy is recommended. <br />48 <br />49 A council member pointed out that the level of resources and the activity level for the city <br />50 don't concur. Staff was directed to bring forward reductions in that light. The options <br />51 presented have essentially been reviewed by the council previously. If the staff isn't <br />52 willing to bring forward the necessary cuts, the council will have to do that. <br />53 <br />54 A council member pointed out that the area of personnel is the biggest part of the budget <br />55 and so is obviously the way to get the necessary reductions. To make that type of <br />56 decision, the council should hear about how service levels to the residents will be <br />57 impacted. <br />58 <br />59 A citizen in the audience addressed the group. She commended the council for <br />60 considering reductions because that is a necessary action. It is disappointing that more <br />61 direct recommendations are not included in the staff report. She spoke against any <br />62 revenue increases. Her question about reduction of funds for street maintenance was <br />63 explained as no reduction by the finance officer. She recommends that since revenue <br />64 from building permits is down drastically, that would be an obvious area for reduction <br />65 since that revenue would normally fund personnel costs for the service. When fuel cost <br />66 increases were questioned, the finance officer explained that energy costs are volatile so <br />67 he doesn't recommend severe changes in budgeting. She suggests that health insurance <br />68 costs should also be reviewed and perhaps other health insurance options could be <br />69 considered. Another recommendation is to reduce engineering costs in a down economy. <br />70 Also, overtime costs (police department mentioned) should be reviewed because use of <br />71 overtime has a low value for the dollar. <br />72 <br />73 A council member requested more consideration on staffing changes and pointed out <br />74 areas within budgets that probably have less activity because of the state of the city. <br />75 Collaborations for park services should be considered. <br />76 <br />77 A council member noted that the council salary should also be on the table. <br />78 <br />79 The meeting was recessed at 6:33 p.m. for the purpose on conducting the regular council <br />80 meeting. <br />81 <br />82 The meeting was reconvened at 7:40 p.m. <br />83 <br />84 Council members individually offered their opinion on the options listed in the staff <br />85 report. <br />86 <br />87 A council member suggested that sharing of clerical duties should be a possibility. Also <br />88 suggested was outsourcing of building inspection duties, with consideration that the area <br />89 has shrunk by about eighty percent. Staff explained that such a change would involve <br />90 service considerations. The building department should generally be self - supporting with <br />2 <br />