My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/24/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
08/24/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:35:44 AM
Creation date
5/23/2014 1:18:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/24/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 10, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />91 the fees they collect. Staff further explained that the nature of business being conducted <br />92 by the building department has changed but the level of permits is staying somewhat the <br />93 same. Last year was, of course, impacted by storm damage. <br />94 <br />95 Public Services Director DeGardner noted the existing joint powers agreement with the <br />96 school district through which the city spends $50,000 to $60,000 per year in maintaining <br />97 some jointly used facilities. <br />98 <br />99 In the administrative, fmance, planning, parks and streets areas, staff was asked to explain <br />100 current needs. <br />101 <br />102 At the request of council, the directors explained the process they used to get to this point. <br />103 Was there communication and opinions shared between directors? Mr. Rolek explained <br />104 that each director prepared a budget for their area of responsibility as they normally <br />105 would for the budget. There was then discussion amongst the group about how <br />106 reductions and how they would impact services. The directors also recognized that while <br />107 this is a very serious situation, at some time the economy will turn around and the city <br />108 needs to be in a position to move with that. They discussed and evaluated the possibly of <br />109 outsourcing some services. Police Chief Pecchia added that the group did identify up to <br />110 15 positions that could be eliminated although there was not necessarily consensus on <br />111 which positions. <br />112 <br />113 A council member suggested that the number one job of the directors was to bring <br />114 forward reductions that would represent an appropriate level of resources for the current <br />115 activity at city hall first and then the council would look past that at other pieces that <br />116 could fill in the puzzle (such as revenue, retirement, furlough, etc). He recommends that <br />117 each director make suggestions across the entire organization perhaps even anonymously <br />118 and then tabulate those results to get to some real recommendations. <br />119 <br />120 Connie Sutherland, Charter Commissioner, asked if the directors have discussed the <br />121 possibility of salary decreases across the board. Mr. Rolek explained that option could be <br />122 problematic since most of the city's employees are attached to labor agreements. <br />123 <br />124 At the request of the council, Mr. Rolek reviewed the delinquent tax situation for the <br />125 special assessments associated with the general obligation bonds of 2005A. There is an <br />126 option to cover the debt service through internal financing for 2010. The forfeiture <br />127 process would begin in 2010 but it's a lengthy process; staff is in the process of analyzing <br />128 the options involved in that outcome including public purpose. <br />129 <br />130 A council member asked if staff is actively exploring the possibility of some sharing in <br />131 the area of public safety services (police and fire). The Police Chief indicated those are <br />132 possibilities and they hold significant potential in savings. The council member also <br />133 asked if, in the area of fire services, could there be efficiencies in merging in additional <br />134 cities? The council member also asked for more information on increasing recreation <br />135 program fees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.