My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/24/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
08/24/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:35:44 AM
Creation date
5/23/2014 1:18:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/24/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 10, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />136 <br />137 A council member pointed out the dynamic of not having a city administrator in place. <br />138 That makes the decision making process somewhat different. Also, as a process person, <br />139 he would like to see staff bring back $1,000,000 in reductions, perhaps in increments. He <br />140 recognizes that there is a balanced budget proposed even though it includes options not <br />141 approved by the council. He believes the goal of the council is to not raise the tax levy. <br />142 <br />143 A council member suggested some review of the process used by Centennial Fire to save <br />144 funds each year for equipment purchases rather than financing. Also it may be time to <br />145 look at the city engineer situation also. <br />146 <br />147 At the request of the Finance Director, the council reviewed the list of options and each <br />148 offered their opinions. <br />149 <br />150 When discussing the 6.17% increase in the total levy, Mr. Rolek explained that the <br />151 increase is mainly due to the special assessment delinquency that was discussed <br />152 previously. <br />153 <br />154 A council member reiterated his desire to have directors weigh in individually on <br />155 organization -wide options. A director expressed concern about offering opinions in <br />156 areas where he has little familiarity. <br />157 <br />158 A council member suggested that a collective effort of directors would be preferable since <br />159 it would allow for collaboration options. <br />160 <br />161 A council member suggested a moderate approach to the delinquent special assessment <br />162 problem. He proposes a split by handling part of the problem through internal loans and <br />163 part by reductions. <br />164 <br />165 The council directed the directors to come to the August 25, 2009 work session with <br />166 specific recommendations for reductions. The directors pledged to work together and <br />167 bring the information the council requests; there will be no individual surveys. <br />168 <br />169 A council member suggested that since there will obviously need to be some personnel <br />170 cuts, they should be considered in each and every area of the organization. <br />171 <br />172 Acting Administrator Tesch explained that there was no list of positions included in the <br />173 report in part because presenting that level of information in fact sets the wheels in <br />174 motion and the city needs to be prepared to act accordingly. <br />175 <br />176 Police Chief Pecchia noted that the Police Department has historically taken a big hit with <br />177 reductions. The department was down three positions in 2008. At this point, he is asking <br />178 that he be authorized to proceed with a proposal to fill the vacant police officer position <br />179 but to eliminate a CSO position at the same time. The council said they would consider <br />180 that request sometime in the future. <br />4 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.