Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 25, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />A council member had been contacted by an employee asking the council to consider alternatives <br />to workforce reduction such as furloughs. It was clarified that the council is looking at all <br />possibilities including a retirement incentive. <br />There was a discussion about a storm water utility and franchise fees as possible revenues <br />sources. It was noted by Director Rolek that most cities in the metro area have implemented a <br />storm water utility and he added it is generally considered a more equitable way to meet the <br />water quality mandate because it removes the cost from the levy and reaches users in a different <br />way. The franchise fee is widely used in the area as well. Staff will be reporting at an upcoming <br />work session on those two revenue options. A council member noted that the budget for 2011 <br />may be just as or more difficult as 2010 and the council may want to reserve the storm water and <br />franchise fee options for those difficult times ahead. <br />Regarding fund balance, Mr. Rolek noted his reservations in recommending any use of that- <br />important resource. It is a one -time use and must be considered cautiously however it could be a <br />good stop -gap until the economy and budget start revitalizing. <br />A council member noted that the city's leadership has worked hard to keep stable or lower the <br />tax rate in the past. If that choice continues, it is important to be cognizant of the impact on staff, <br />citizens and services. It is clearly a difficult time for cities and tough choices on both ends — <br />taxes and services — are being made. Mr. Rolek noted that governments generally feel the <br />impact of an economic downturn such as this later because of the taxation process etc. It is <br />important however to remember that the city needs to be ready for the rebound when it comes. <br />City employees were in attendance at the meeting and were invited by the council to <br />engage in the discussion. <br />Bart Anderson, AFSCME Council 5 business agent for Local 2454 read a letter prepared by the <br />union membership. He also noted concern regarding the proposal for early retirement in that it <br />has not been properly negotiated through the collective bargaining process. He will be reviewing <br />the program documents and will work with Mr. Tesch if there are concerns. He is also <br />concerned that the union has not been asked to engage in a meet and confer process in regard to <br />proposed layoffs. Mr. Anderson noted the great concern of the Local membership with the <br />current situation as well as the membership's interest in working together with the council and <br />city to meet the challenges. <br />Tim Hillescheim, on behalf of the 49ers union, suggested they would welcome the chance to talk <br />about options and how their members can be a part of collectively working together to solve <br />some of the city's budget problems. <br />Lisa Hogstad, Community Development Secretary, remarked that the written report received by <br />the council indicates the duties that would be lost with the proposed work force reduction. She is <br />concerned that the information presented is incomplete and that those employees do much more <br />and the city will lose much more than what is being presented. <br />• <br />