Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />DRAFT <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />August 31, 2009 <br />: August 31, 2009 <br />. 5:30 p.m. <br />. 6:40 p.m. <br />: Council Members Reinert, Stoltz, <br />Gallup, O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : none <br />Staff present: Acting City Administrator, Dan Tesch; Director of Finance, Al Rolek; <br />Director of Public Safety, Dave Pecchia; Director of Public Services, Rick DeGardner, <br />Director of Community Development, Michael Grochala; City Clerk, Julie Bartell <br />Mayor Bergeson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Room at <br />Lino Lakes City Hall. <br />The council continued previous discussions of the 2010 budget proposal. <br />Finance Director Rolek indicated that, at the last work session, the council had asked for <br />more information in the area of discussion with staff and labor bargaining groups, <br />valuation data from Anoka County, and internal loan funding for the Legacy bond debt <br />service. <br />Acting Administrator Tesch reported that he had met with labor representatives (LELS, <br />AFSCME and 49ers) with the goal of discussing budget options to avoid employee lay- <br />offs. Everyone is on board as far as looking at furloughs in the area of one to two weeks. <br />He has also discussed the early retirement incentive program details with the unions and <br />feels they are now on board. <br />Finance Director Rolek provided written information to the council on net tax capacity <br />calculations. He has calculated that each percentage change in rate equals an amount just <br />under $197,000; he presented the levy amount necessary to hold the 2009 tax rate as well <br />as the budget reduction amount needed for that level tax rate. It was clarified that the <br />figures presented are expenditure based with no new revenue included. <br />A council member requested discussion about the possibility of further delaying the <br />filling of the City Administrator position, recognizing that these are extraordinary times <br />and everything should be on the table. Staff explained that they have included that <br />position in the 2010 budget proposals. <br />A council member recommended that the first decision point should be the tax rate goal <br />45 and move from there on a specific budget Another council member recalled previous <br />46 discussions about the need to look at decisions on a two -year basis recognizing that more <br />