My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/28/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
09/28/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 10:47:26 AM
Creation date
5/27/2014 10:16:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/28/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 31, 2009 <br />DRAFT <br />47 hard times most likely lay ahead in 2011. That two -year view should include all the <br />48 pieces, and hard decisions in the area of employees should be made up front and perhaps <br />49 revenue options such as storm water utility and franchise fees left for next year. <br />50 <br />51 Finance Director Rolek discussed the interfund loan proposed to handle the 2010 debt <br />52 service on the Legacy bonds. Staff is still assuming that approximately one -half of that <br />53 debt service will be handled through such a loan, thereby leaving some flexibility for <br />54 2011. <br />55 <br />56 Regarding the maximum tax rate that will be approved by the council on September 14 <br />57 and forwarded, the council concurred they would go with 38.616 (a reduction). Having <br />58 that number in place, Mr. Rolek suggested that the council can have more discussion at <br />59 the September 8 work session on how to budget to represent that figure. The council <br />60 concurred that the figure is a maximum and the goal is a reduction from that point. <br />61 <br />62 There was a discussion of fund balance and Mr. Rolek asked for clarification that the <br />63 originally proposed use of $93,377 is on the table. One council member suggested that <br />64 the maximum rate discussion leaves the fund balance at a different figure. Another <br />65 member said he believes that fund balance represents levied but unused tax funds that <br />66 should be returned to the taxpayers (or to use the funds as part of a future budget). A <br />67 third council member suggested that he doesn't support use of fund balance at all — it <br />68 isn't a prudent budgeting tool. A majority of the council agreed to leave the $93,377 on <br />69 the table but with further discussion and review of fund balance. <br />70 <br />71 Regarding implementation of revenue options, staff remarked that they could begin the <br />72 review process but wouldn't recommend planning on any revenue for 2010 — 2011 would <br />73 be more realistic. <br />74 <br />75 On Mr. Rolek's question about presenting options for (partial or fully) funding internally <br />76 the debt service on the Legacy bonds, the council requested that staff report back on the <br />77 status of the project and options to get things moving. <br />78 <br />79 The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. <br />so <br />81 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council meeting held on September <br />82 28, 2009. <br />83 <br />84 <br />85 <br />86 <br />87 City Clerk, Julianne Bartell John Bergeson, Mayor <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.