Laserfiche WebLink
Julie Bartell <br />'Lo 1 73kdrE- <br />From: Dan Tesch <br />Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:00 PM <br />To: Julie Bartell <br />Subject: FW: <br />Budget email... <br />From: Dan Tesch <br />Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 4:44 PM <br />To: droeser @comcast.net; j- bergeson @bethel.edu; jeff @maildyne.com; Jeffery O'Donnell (jeff.odonnell@impact- <br />group.biz); Kathi Gallup Work (kathi.gallup @dllc.org) <br />Cc: Alan Rolek; Dan Tesch; Dave Pecchia; Michael Grochala; Rick DeGardner <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Bergeson and City Council Members <br />The 2010 Proposed Budget presented to Council includes reduction of 5 FTE positions and furloughs of 2 weeks for <br />employees and 3 weeks for Directors. Staff review of the budget during this week has made an additional $130,000 <br />available due to these reductions. Staff suggests that these additional funds be applied to the areas identified by <br />Council at the last work session - increasing street maintenance and storm drainage maintenance efforts, capital <br />equipment replacement and contingency. This would help to bring these areas more in line with the where they should <br />be according to city documents. <br />Council member -elect Rob Rafferty distributed a matrix at the last work session relative to budgeting for health <br />insurance, showing actual to budgeted amounts and the discrepancy between them. The budgeting philosophy and <br />general policy followed by staff for many years has been to budget for employee health insurance using the family <br />contribution rate and to factor in an adjustment for the expected increase in premiums for the coming year. Up until <br />the last year, the city's renewal date for health insurance was September 1. Last year this changed to January 1. This <br />method of budgeting is conservative given certain uncertainties in expected increases, employee status changes, etc.. <br />For example, the expected premium increase used in 2009 for budget purposes was 15 %, but actually was 30 %. This <br />method of budgeting allowed the additional 15% to be absorbed in the budget as presented. At the same time, actual <br />benefit levels offered in the city offered health insurance plans have decreased over the last few years. The budget <br />philosophy being used now results in a difference of about $180,000. A less conservative budgeting approach may be <br />closer to actual cost but would not provide for these unknowns. A budgeting policy discussion surrounding this budget <br />approach is recommended. <br />Dan <br />1 <br />