My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/07/2009 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2009
>
12/07/2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2014 1:33:25 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 9:00:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/07/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Julie Bartell <br />'Lo 1 73kdrE- <br />From: Dan Tesch <br />Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:00 PM <br />To: Julie Bartell <br />Subject: FW: <br />Budget email... <br />From: Dan Tesch <br />Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 4:44 PM <br />To: droeser @comcast.net; j- bergeson @bethel.edu; jeff @maildyne.com; Jeffery O'Donnell (jeff.odonnell@impact- <br />group.biz); Kathi Gallup Work (kathi.gallup @dllc.org) <br />Cc: Alan Rolek; Dan Tesch; Dave Pecchia; Michael Grochala; Rick DeGardner <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Bergeson and City Council Members <br />The 2010 Proposed Budget presented to Council includes reduction of 5 FTE positions and furloughs of 2 weeks for <br />employees and 3 weeks for Directors. Staff review of the budget during this week has made an additional $130,000 <br />available due to these reductions. Staff suggests that these additional funds be applied to the areas identified by <br />Council at the last work session - increasing street maintenance and storm drainage maintenance efforts, capital <br />equipment replacement and contingency. This would help to bring these areas more in line with the where they should <br />be according to city documents. <br />Council member -elect Rob Rafferty distributed a matrix at the last work session relative to budgeting for health <br />insurance, showing actual to budgeted amounts and the discrepancy between them. The budgeting philosophy and <br />general policy followed by staff for many years has been to budget for employee health insurance using the family <br />contribution rate and to factor in an adjustment for the expected increase in premiums for the coming year. Up until <br />the last year, the city's renewal date for health insurance was September 1. Last year this changed to January 1. This <br />method of budgeting is conservative given certain uncertainties in expected increases, employee status changes, etc.. <br />For example, the expected premium increase used in 2009 for budget purposes was 15 %, but actually was 30 %. This <br />method of budgeting allowed the additional 15% to be absorbed in the budget as presented. At the same time, actual <br />benefit levels offered in the city offered health insurance plans have decreased over the last few years. The budget <br />philosophy being used now results in a difference of about $180,000. A less conservative budgeting approach may be <br />closer to actual cost but would not provide for these unknowns. A budgeting policy discussion surrounding this budget <br />approach is recommended. <br />Dan <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.