My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/11/2001 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
07/11/2001 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 11:05:27 AM
Creation date
6/3/2014 10:38:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/11/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 6. Lighting plan details are provided as to fixtures proposed throughout the <br />development and the lighting levels. <br />• <br />• <br />Comment: Lighting details have been provided. The applicant is proposing to <br />use a decorative fixture similar to City campus lighting. The layout and spacing <br />of the fixtures does not provide the effect intended. Staff recommends that <br />decorative lighting fixtures be spaced at 75 to 100 foot intervals and staggered <br />on opposite sides of each main drive aisle and along the fronts of buildings. <br />The parking lot fixtures are shoebox style with downcast lighting which is <br />desirable to control spill -over lighting. Lighting levels meet the ordinance, except <br />along the rear of Kohl's. The ordinance requires 0.4 foot candles at the property <br />line where adjacent to residential. This lighting level will need to be reduced. <br />7. All engineering comments are addressed. <br />Comment: The City Engineer's comments are attached in a letter dated July 6, <br />2001. <br />8. A detailed sign proposal that includes all signage proposed with detail on sign <br />dimensions to allow an overall analysis. <br />Comment: Signage has been addressed in the project narrative and sign <br />submittal for the monument signs. The Sign Ordinance does not specifically <br />address a development such as this, which is designed as a multiple tenant site, <br />but all of the buildings are detached. <br />The Sign Ordinance speaks to single tenant buildings and multiple tenant <br />buildings. Under the ordinance, each lot or building would be allowed one wall <br />sign and one freestanding or pylon sign. <br />Instead of having multiple freestanding or pylon signs, the applicant is proposing <br />to limit freestanding signs to two adjacent to the freeway; one at Apollo Drive; two <br />at the second entrance; and one off of Apollo Drive. <br />The sign faces of the freestanding signs are within the area allowed by ordinance <br />and the height requested is consistent with the ordinance. <br />Staff is concerned about the size of the non -sign portion of the monuments and <br />the height of signs along Lake Drive. The structures are 18 feet in length and are <br />proposed at the access which could cause sight — distance concerns. Staff <br />recommends that free - standing signs be allowed as follows: <br />A. Freestanding signage along 1 -35 be limited to one Joint Identification <br />Sign <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.