08/08/2001 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board July 11, 2001 Page 19 15. Dedication of access control to Anoka County should be shown on the plat along Lots 1, 2, 3 and Outlot C adjacent to Lake Drive. The opening width for the secondary access will need to be determined by Anoka County. 16. The development agreement shall incorporate a cross access and ingress /egress easement should be provided for the remnant parcel located between Apollo Drive and Lots 3 and 4. 17. The sidewalk shall be extended on Lot 8 to the southerly property line. 18. A concrete pavement treatment shall be used for crosswalks on major drive lanes. Tom Palmquist, representing Ryan Companies, stated he was present with John Payton, the Project Engineer. Regarding condition number two, Mr. Palmquist stated the plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District and he hoped to have approval from them by July 25, 2001. He stated Anoka County has agreed to the igation of wetlands on their property. Regarding condition number six, Mr. Palmquist ., ov ded 'ty Engineer with a packet of the requested information and apologized f• = sub ttal of these items. Regarding condition number 12, Mr. P. 'st sta he was hoping that the County Traffic Engineer will grant approval of the proposed. He indicated without this access alignment the development of ='ve forward. Regarding condition number indicated that it would b points to the Apollo remain. He stated Kohl' proposed handicap stalls. 13, quist stated Kohl's Project Engineer had eliminate the eastern and western most access ion, however, the middle four access points must greeable to the landscaping islands adjacent to the Mr. Palmquist stated with regard to the planting beds in front of the Kohl's store, there is a conflict with some of the tree grades. He stated that he would like to work with staff to eliminate the tree grades and add more plantings. Mr. Palmquist stated Kohl's requires a 9 1/2 foot parking stall width. He stated he was in agreement with conditions 4 and 15. He stated the requirements for lighting found in condition number five were acceptable, however, he was concerned about the cost of the additional light fixtures. He stated he would like to work with staff to find a similar but less costly fixture. Mr. Grochala indicated the original suggestion was that the development use the same light fixture chosen for the Town Center. He indicated the Town Center light fixtures have not yet been installed and staff was willing to work with the developer to find a similar less costly fixture that could be used in the Town Center as well.