08/08/2001 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board July 11, 2001 Page 20 Rafferty expressed concern that the developer not dictate the light fixture style. Mr. Grochala indicated staff will make the decision on the light fixture style. Mr. Palmquist stated that the concern was not with the style of the light fixture but with their cost. With regard to condition number eight, Mr. Palmquist stated the Joint Identification Sign along Lake Drive and the monument sign had been redesigned per the recommendations of staff. He asked that flexibility be allowed for the Joint Identification Signs along I- 35W. He stated Kohl's was concerned about the scaling down of their logo to fit on one sign with the Target store logo. He stated both Target and Kohl's were insisting they be allowed individual signs along the highway. He stated that both signs would comply with City ordinance. Mr. Palmquist stated he did not oppose the requirements for the rear wall signs on Buildings C and D, however, if a larger tenant comes in, he would prefer that they be allowed a larger sign. Chair Schaps called for a recess at 9:13 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:27 p.m. Mr. Palmquist stated during the recess the signa sue had been discussed. He stated the primary concern was that the sign or the ` ears of Buildings C and D be proportionate to the sizes of the buildings. With regard to the uses of the v uses will be known as the marke some restaurants will be i , Mr. Palmquist stated that the anticipated development continues. He anticipated that Mr. Rafferty expressed co at the proposed restrictions on the hours for delivery vehicles with refrigeration uni may not be sufficient. He noted the homes to the north behind Target are older homes and many do not have air conditioning systems and he felt it likely that their windows will be open at night during the summer months. He felt deliveries should not be allowed between 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Mr. Payton stated during the EAW process noise air modeling tests had been performed, including the refrigeration units. He stated that the noise levels met the MPCA guidelines. Mr. Palmquist stated Target prefers that the delivery hours be restricted only from 11:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. He stated this issue had been discussed and Target agreed to the restricted hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. and he did not believe they would agree to changing these hours to 8:00 p.m. until 8:00 a.m. He indicated trucks generally do not make deliveries after 8:00 p.m. but Target would like the flexibility in the off chance a later delivery must be made. For these reasons, he respectfully asked that the non- delivery hours remain 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m.