08/08/2001 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board July 11, 2001 Page 21 Mr. Palmquist stated that the intent of marketing would be to attract restaurants and other smaller retail users such as a coffee shop, a Great Clips, Pro -ex, etc. Mr. Palmquist stated the issues regarding condition number 12 had been discussed during the recess and he felt comfortable with the result of these discussions. With regard to condition number 14, Mr. Palmquist stated comments will likely be received from the Rice Creek Watershed District on July 25, 2001 and there may be some design issues that he did not feel could be completed by the proposed deadline of 4:30 p.m. on July 26, 2001. He asked if it would be possible to add a couple of days to the deadline. Mr. Powell stated it would be acceptable to extend the deadline to July 27, 2001 at 4:30 p.m. Mr. Palmquist stated he was comfortable with the requirements of condition number 16. Chair Schaps asked what the intentions are for the reran. parcel. Mr. Palmquist stated they would like to incorporate the remnant parcel into .a development. Mr. Wessel stated in order to obtain the remnant to go through an eminent domain process. worthless to the City and he believed there may b this project. He stated that included in th ,finelop to sell the parcel of land to Ryan Companie 1, the " &p; s would require the City cate• that the parcel of land is me value integrating the parcel into t agreement will be a negotiation Mr. Palmquist stated he was c With regard to condition number being used for crosswalk Center guidelines. Ho and maintenance considera and there are potential heavin wi the requirement of condition number 17. d the original plan had showed concrete pads a area in order to be consistent with the Town lements had been removed from the plans due to cost e indicated concrete can be stained by vehicle tires roblems when concrete is installed directly adjacent to bituminous. For these reasons, he would prefer to not be held to condition number 18. Chair Schaps asked Mr. Palmquist if he could propose an alternative to using concrete pads for the crosswalks, other than painting stripes. Mr. Palmquist did not have an alternative to suggest. Chair Schaps felt that some middle ground could be reached on this issue. He felt that the requirement of condition number 18 was reasonable for aesthetic concerns. Mr. Payton noted some developments have used pavers to delineate crosswalks but the pavers often turn black from the vehicle tires and become dirty looking. He felt that a continuous surface would appear more uniform and be easier to maintain. Chair Schaps suggested that this issue be left for further discussion.