Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />P & Z MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM V . B <br />Jeff Smyser <br />August 8, 2001 <br />- Variance From Road Setback <br />- Variance To Allow 6' Fence Along Rear Yard <br />Abutting Front Yard of Neighbor <br />Gerald & Geraldine Ramsay <br />1168 Ruffed Grouse Court <br />This item involves two variances: a pool setback from a road and the height of a fence <br />along a neighbor's front yard. At the July meeting, P & Z tabled the item and directed <br />staff to communicate with the Ramsays to determine the potential to move the pool and <br />have the City bear the cost. <br />To provide a brief summary as a reminder of the facts: <br />Setback Variance: The Ramsays applied for a permit in May to build an above- <br />ground pool. A pool in the originally proposed location would block drainage and water <br />would back up to the house. The Ramsays then proposed to put the pool over on one side <br />of the yard. Building inspections approved the permit and the Ramsays built the pool. <br />The pool is approximately 20 feet from the right of way. Belatedly, City staff recognized <br />that the pool didn't meet the required setback from a road, which is 30 feet for all <br />structures. Staff is processing this variance at no charge to the Ramsays because of the <br />oversight. <br />Fence Variance: The second variance involves a proposed fence around the back <br />yard and pool. The Ramsay's lot fronts on Ruffed Grouse Court. Their rear lot line is the <br />side lot line of their neighbors' house, which fronts on Ruffed Grouse Road. The zoning <br />ordinance addresses fences in such a situation, which is common with corner lots. The <br />intent is to prevent a front yard from being closed in by a neighbor's six -foot fence along <br />that neighbor's back and side yards. <br />ANALYSIS <br />City staff and the Ramsays have been in communication about the costs of the suggested <br />action. Mr. Ramsay has sent a draft of proposed costs. The City received the attached <br />• <br />