08/08/2001 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 29 • Mr. Lyden asked if the cul -de -sac could be brought the opposite way. Mr. Ruus stated that had not been looked at and he was not sure if the previous designer had looked at those options or not. He stated they were limited however by wetlands and topography. He also indicated that by doing that, he did not believe it would eliminate access off of 12th and Holly. • Mr. Corson made a MOTION to closed the public hearing at 10:45 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Rafferty stated he would like to see the lot lines realigned to create a better neighborhood. He would strongly support that effort so it would all come off of the same cul -de -sac. Mr. Ruus stated he understood the Board's concerns, but Lot 8 could be the problem. He stated Lot 1 was more workable. Chair Schaps also agreed in combining Lots 1 and 2 and splitting Lot 8 uus stated if that was the direction, they would need to start all over He indicated th ononu 'mpact would affect them and they would need to redesign this area Mr. Raffe e ssed 's concern about them starting over again because of the loss of two lots. He st d tls w ry close to being a very acceptable plan without redesigning the whole area. Mr. Ruus stated it was his understanding this was wh Ms. Lane stated she did not have concern about access on 12th and Holly and would not suppo Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to deny Lane. Motion carried 5 -0. Chair Schaps stated the reasons d 8, but did have concerns about the se of that. at application, and was supported by Ms. w - : "e as follows: 1. There was a re x :raw• . F= use 3 the property in question. 2. There was no pligh A the landowner due to physical circumstances unique to this property. 3. There is an consideration. 4. Not applicab 5. The Ordinanc ' did allow for reasonable use and there was also a question of access and safety. With respect to the preliminary plat, the reason for denial was because of access and safety issues; no neighborhood consistency; and not all driveways being located on the cul -de -sac. J. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Pinnacle Towers, 870 Birch Streets Rezone, Amended C.U.P., Amend Zoning Ordinance This item was withdrawn by applicant. • Chair Schaps reopened the hearing at 11:00 p.m. There being no comments made, the public hearing was closed.